Tools & Wizards About Us
zigglio.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 9

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

zigglio.com

Zigglio - Inbound caller retargeting

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

42 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

282 ms

zigglio.com screenshot

About Website

Visit zigglio.com now to see the best up-to-date Zigglio content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about zigglio.com

Visit zigglio.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Zigglio.com page load time and found that the first response time was 42 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

zigglio.com performance score

9

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.6 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,600 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.856

4/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

zigglio.com

42 ms

zigglio.com

394 ms

animate.min.css

374 ms

freshGrid.css

324 ms

style.min.css

307 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Zigglio.com, 11% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Zigglio.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 270.4 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Zigglio.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 983.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 102.4 kB

  • Original 120.1 kB
  • After minification 119.9 kB
  • After compression 17.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 102.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 133.5 kB

  • Original 983.7 kB
  • After minification 850.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Zigglio needs image optimization as it can save up to 133.5 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 33.7 kB

  • Original 476.6 kB
  • After minification 476.4 kB
  • After compression 442.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 705 B

  • Original 214.3 kB
  • After minification 214.3 kB
  • After compression 213.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Zigglio.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (70%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zigglio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

zigglio.com

zigglio.com

42 ms

zigglio.com

zigglio.com

394 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

374 ms

freshGrid.css

freshGrid.css

324 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

307 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

367 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css

374 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

310 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

616 ms

cubeportfolio.min.css

cubeportfolio.min.css

609 ms

ff-font-awesome4.css

ff-font-awesome4.css

623 ms

ff-font-et-line.css

ff-font-et-line.css

655 ms

ff-font-simple-line-icons.css

ff-font-simple-line-icons.css

684 ms

one-page-business.css

one-page-business.css

668 ms

landing.css

landing.css

917 ms

style.css

style.css

928 ms

css

css

32 ms

colors.css

colors.css

954 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1005 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

996 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

1246 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

1246 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

1216 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

1270 ms

jquery.freshGrid.js

jquery.freshGrid.js

1306 ms

frslib.js

frslib.js

1313 ms

effect.min.js

effect.min.js

1510 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1557 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

1563 ms

jquery.back-to-top.js

jquery.back-to-top.js

1562 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

1596 ms

magnific-popup.js

magnific-popup.js

1606 ms

form-modal.js

form-modal.js

1806 ms

wow.js

wow.js

1861 ms

jquery.imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

jquery.imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

1853 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1849 ms

owl-carousel.js

owl-carousel.js

1899 ms

auto-hiding-navbar.js

auto-hiding-navbar.js

1901 ms

header-sticky.js

header-sticky.js

1798 ms

custom-owl-carousel.js

custom-owl-carousel.js

1846 ms

app.js

app.js

1619 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

175 ms

zigglio-logo-white-1.png

zigglio-logo-white-1.png

1202 ms

zigglio-logo-purple-1-1.png

zigglio-logo-purple-1-1.png

1203 ms

custom-audiences-1.png

custom-audiences-1.png

1203 ms

keyword-segmentation-1.png

keyword-segmentation-1.png

1213 ms

ad-sequencing.png

ad-sequencing.png

1420 ms

test-drive.png

test-drive.png

1678 ms

home-services.png

home-services.png

1679 ms

education.png

education.png

1679 ms

prof-services.png

prof-services.png

1680 ms

health.png

health.png

1680 ms

2e332ff156e1f130428cb79e6c698c78_increase-direct-mail-conversion-rate-768-c-90.jpg

2e332ff156e1f130428cb79e6c698c78_increase-direct-mail-conversion-rate-768-c-90.jpg

1705 ms

3e104b6b83ba7e564b6a5d79216dcb13_Zigglio-Wins-Facebook-Accelerator-768-c-90.jpg

3e104b6b83ba7e564b6a5d79216dcb13_Zigglio-Wins-Facebook-Accelerator-768-c-90.jpg

1753 ms

ab8d2c046678e927011e55f9d37b6d1d_facebook-accelerator-2017-768-c-90.png

ab8d2c046678e927011e55f9d37b6d1d_facebook-accelerator-2017-768-c-90.png

1756 ms

69593c12902bd42eef5e14d6302cf4cd_increase-custome-audience-match-rate-1024x535-768-c-90.jpg

69593c12902bd42eef5e14d6302cf4cd_increase-custome-audience-match-rate-1024x535-768-c-90.jpg

1757 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

17 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

29 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

41 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

51 ms

ff-font-et-line.woff

ff-font-et-line.woff

1798 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjARc9.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjARc9.ttf

50 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu52xP.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu52xP.ttf

50 ms

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBhc9.ttf

KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBhc9.ttf

49 ms

ff-font-simple-line-icons.woff

ff-font-simple-line-icons.woff

1805 ms

ff-font-awesome4.woff

ff-font-awesome4.woff

1963 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

50 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

3 ms

xLzNnW0CwH4

xLzNnW0CwH4

105 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

9 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

43 ms

base.js

base.js

80 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

175 ms

om_QuI9M6WDewyV11PDqwyZXtjss-zYzBgeHLXyLCgE.js

om_QuI9M6WDewyV11PDqwyZXtjss-zYzBgeHLXyLCgE.js

102 ms

embed.js

embed.js

37 ms

id

id

46 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

17 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

18 ms

Create

Create

148 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

18 ms

Accessibility Review

zigglio.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

zigglio.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

zigglio.com SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Zigglio.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Zigglio.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

zigglio.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Zigglio. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: