Tools & Wizards About Us
zimbra.no screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

zimbra.no

Altidata - #handlelokalt - Vi ser deg som kunde og dine behov

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

363 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

474 ms

zimbra.no screenshot

About Website

Welcome to zimbra.no homepage info - get ready to check Zimbra best content right away, or after learning these important things about zimbra.no

Vi kan tilby en god totalpakke med blant annet internett, trådløst nett, epost, fildeling og sikkerhetsløsninger på samme faktura.

Visit zimbra.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Zimbra.no page load time and found that the first response time was 363 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

zimbra.no performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value610 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

zimbra.no

363 ms

altidata.no

531 ms

fxf0l.css

487 ms

f9fz2.js

518 ms

lazysizes.min.js

296 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Zimbra.no, 85% (17 requests) were made to Altidata.no and 5% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (782 ms) relates to the external source Altidata.no.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 946.3 kB (69%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

422.9 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Zimbra.no main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 633.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 89.0 kB

  • Original 102.8 kB
  • After minification 100.9 kB
  • After compression 13.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 295.4 kB

  • Original 633.1 kB
  • After minification 633.1 kB
  • After compression 337.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 295.4 kB or 47% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 561.9 kB

  • Original 633.4 kB
  • After minification 632.8 kB
  • After compression 71.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Zimbra.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 561.9 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (64%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zimbra. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

zimbra.no

zimbra.no

363 ms

altidata.no

altidata.no

531 ms

fxf0l.css

fxf0l.css

487 ms

f9fz2.js

f9fz2.js

518 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

296 ms

f9fz2.css

f9fz2.css

389 ms

api.js

api.js

32 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

293 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

341 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

538 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

395 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

460 ms

autoptimize_265e735d90b84a73b29f19e9fdca9159.js

autoptimize_265e735d90b84a73b29f19e9fdca9159.js

782 ms

altidata_logo_vector-1.webp

altidata_logo_vector-1.webp

132 ms

slider1_trans.webp

slider1_trans.webp

133 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

386 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

117 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

290 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

136 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

26 ms

Accessibility Review

zimbra.no accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

zimbra.no best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

zimbra.no SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NO

  • Language Claimed

    NB

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Zimbra.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Zimbra.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

zimbra.no

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Zimbra. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: