2.9 sec in total
299 ms
2.3 sec
350 ms
Click here to check amazing Zippick content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about zippick.com
Buy a domain and see how a premium domain can be the best investment. Your business starts here. Buy a domain today.
Visit zippick.comWe analyzed Zippick.com page load time and found that the first response time was 299 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
zippick.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.0 s
0/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value8.5 s
17/100
10%
Value3,100 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.191
64/100
15%
Value18.9 s
3/100
10%
299 ms
199 ms
59 ms
46 ms
68 ms
Our browser made a total of 118 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Zippick.com, 10% (12 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 5% (6 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (478 ms) relates to the external source Gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 740.6 kB (65%)
1.1 MB
404.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Zippick.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 770.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.2 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Zippick needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 513.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 513.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 189.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Zippick.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 189.3 kB or 61% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (77%)
94
22
The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zippick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
zippick.com
299 ms
monetate.js
199 ms
application.css
59 ms
ng-modal.css
46 ms
angular.min.js
68 ms
ng-modal.js
46 ms
google_analytics.js
44 ms
google_oauth.js
45 ms
bold_chat.js
52 ms
eloqua.js
51 ms
hotjar.js
54 ms
adroll.js
51 ms
impactRadius.js
49 ms
in.js
130 ms
api.js
233 ms
api:client.js
165 ms
app.js
47 ms
cookies.js
47 ms
socialMedia.js
50 ms
countryDropdown.js
50 ms
monetate.js
60 ms
index.js
59 ms
lander.js
58 ms
seoPages.js
79 ms
sitePages.js
79 ms
search.js
79 ms
modal.js
95 ms
forms.js
95 ms
tldSelector.js
95 ms
setFixedTop.js
99 ms
searchBar.js
100 ms
currency.js
98 ms
trust.js
119 ms
conversion.js
121 ms
lander-v2.css
117 ms
tdfs-inner.css
118 ms
tdfs-temp.css
119 ms
thankyou.css
102 ms
entry.js
9 ms
css
41 ms
fontawesome.min.css
37 ms
bd-icons.min.css
39 ms
ga.js
42 ms
foundation-A136666-2811-40ba-bff2-3df3af8bc2ae1.min.js
126 ms
userspace
122 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
116 ms
recaptcha__en.js
478 ms
all.js
334 ms
335 ms
ss-social-regular.css
80 ms
css
95 ms
logo-header-2x.png
74 ms
__utm.gif
256 ms
__utm.gif
226 ms
foundation-tags-SD780-3f5b-4f28-957f-6e6dc25a7fc41.min.js
213 ms
postmessageRelay
304 ms
framework
153 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
217 ms
361 ms
hotjar-10205.js
166 ms
elqCfg.min.js
162 ms
__utm.gif
144 ms
collect
292 ms
143 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
180 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
179 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
166 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
174 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
200 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
194 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
168 ms
anchor
93 ms
svrGP
274 ms
modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js
124 ms
343 ms
iframe
79 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
66 ms
xd_arbiter.php
213 ms
xd_arbiter.php
323 ms
styles__ltr.css
61 ms
1233565733-idpiframe.js
117 ms
-FHGegChvKELgmHNPF97Aj33qC9PBXl7UyexHItfpAU.js
83 ms
webworker.js
95 ms
logo_48.png
79 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
144 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
145 ms
iframerpc
115 ms
svrGP.aspx
121 ms
vms.js
81 ms
roundtrip.js
11 ms
recaptcha__en.js
24 ms
xd_arbiter.php
51 ms
bc.pv
106 ms
6ESKICLQUVAGDN5NI2ETS4.js
35 ms
fbevents.hashing.js
54 ms
out
21 ms
81 ms
13 ms
27 ms
out
13 ms
out
25 ms
out
30 ms
out
31 ms
out
31 ms
out
32 ms
out
38 ms
out
37 ms
47 ms
u.php
104 ms
adsct
135 ms
pixel
96 ms
47 ms
71 ms
sync
27 ms
377928.gif
37 ms
sd
30 ms
tap.php
50 ms
in
24 ms
zippick.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
zippick.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
zippick.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Zippick.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Zippick.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
zippick.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Zippick. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: