Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

Page Load Speed

19.9 sec in total

First Response

3.2 sec

Resources Loaded

16.3 sec

Page Rendered

413 ms

zirc.info screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Zirc content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about zirc.info

Visit zirc.info

Key Findings

We analyzed Zirc.info page load time and found that the first response time was 3.2 sec and then it took 16.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

zirc.info performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.155

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

zirc.info

3158 ms

www.zirc.info

2117 ms

1294 ms

ujhirdtab.js

628 ms

ujhirdval.js

666 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Zirc.info, 17% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 13% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.7 sec) relates to the external source Radixmedia.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 88.8 kB (52%)

Content Size

172.0 kB

After Optimization

83.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Zirc.info main page is 172.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 88.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 72.9 kB

  • Original 88.0 kB
  • After minification 86.9 kB
  • After compression 15.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 45.2 kB
  • After minification 44.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Zirc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

  • Original 33.3 kB
  • After minification 33.1 kB
  • After compression 22.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 10.8 kB or 32% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 5.5 kB
  • After minification 5.0 kB
  • After compression 1.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Zirc.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.0 kB or 72% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (42%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

14

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zirc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

zirc.info accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

zirc.info best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

zirc.info SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    HU

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-2

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Zirc.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Hungarian. Our system also found out that Zirc.info main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-2. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Zirc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: