Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

zivra.com

Zivra - DevSecOps, Security, Digital Transformation Consulting

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

17 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

282 ms

zivra.com screenshot

About Website

Visit zivra.com now to see the best up-to-date Zivra content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about zivra.com

Zivra is a leading Consulting Practice with a focus on DevSecOps, Cybersecurity, Digital Transformation, Agile, and Cloud Strategy & Migration. DevSecOps Consultants. Cloud Consultants. Agile Consulta...

Visit zivra.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Zivra.com page load time and found that the first response time was 17 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

zivra.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,620 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.167

71/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value34.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

zivra.com

17 ms

www.zivra.com

32 ms

www.zivra.com

225 ms

main_v4.570878d71b594bf4257d.bundle.css

46 ms

detectIE-c385c24313ef0e9e4e7a1e131bf5e59f0fbd468f9f9ef44fd6739ae84ef0c0a4.js

203 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Zivra.com, 28% (9 requests) were made to Static-assets.strikinglycdn.com and 28% (9 requests) were made to Custom-images.strikinglycdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Static-fonts.strikinglycdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 485.1 kB (26%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Zivra.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 464.7 kB

  • Original 560.4 kB
  • After minification 559.6 kB
  • After compression 95.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 464.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 20.1 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Zivra images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 189 B

  • Original 20.2 kB
  • After minification 20.2 kB
  • After compression 20.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (29%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

15

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zivra. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

zivra.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

zivra.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

zivra.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Zivra.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Zivra.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Zivra. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: