Tools & Wizards About Us
zixtel.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

zixtel.com

Zixtel

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

643 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

494 ms

zixtel.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Zixtel content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about zixtel.com

IT Recycling Specialists providing Secure Data Destruction, ITAD and On-Site Services. Your trusted IT Lifecycle partner.

Visit zixtel.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Zixtel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 643 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

zixtel.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.6 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

zixtel.com

643 ms

style.min.css

152 ms

style.min.css

305 ms

trx_addons_icons.css

303 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

157 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Zixtel.com, 8% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (838 ms) belongs to the original domain Zixtel.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (50%)

Content Size

3.5 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Zixtel.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 103.1 kB

  • Original 126.1 kB
  • After minification 123.5 kB
  • After compression 22.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 103.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 513.4 kB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Zixtel needs image optimization as it can save up to 513.4 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 689.0 kB

  • Original 967.2 kB
  • After minification 967.2 kB
  • After compression 278.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 689.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 424.0 kB

  • Original 479.1 kB
  • After minification 434.4 kB
  • After compression 55.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Zixtel.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 424.0 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (63%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zixtel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

zixtel.com

zixtel.com

643 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

152 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

305 ms

trx_addons_icons.css

trx_addons_icons.css

303 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

magnific-popup.min.css

157 ms

__styles.css

__styles.css

384 ms

trx_addons.animations.css

trx_addons.animations.css

454 ms

interactivity.min.js

interactivity.min.js

303 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

390 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

309 ms

css

css

29 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

390 ms

view.min.js

view.min.js

379 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

615 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

838 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

487 ms

__scripts.js

__scripts.js

613 ms

cropped-cropped-zixtel_logo_master-1.png

cropped-cropped-zixtel_logo_master-1.png

83 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

81 ms

Untitled-design-47.png

Untitled-design-47.png

380 ms

drone-picture-7-1-of-1-1-1.png

drone-picture-7-1-of-1-1-1.png

240 ms

dfsfsefwefwef-1024x683.png

dfsfsefwefwef-1024x683.png

538 ms

font

font

17 ms

font

font

15 ms

trx_addons_icons.woff

trx_addons_icons.woff

192 ms

__responsive.css

__responsive.css

78 ms

Accessibility Review

zixtel.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

zixtel.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

zixtel.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Zixtel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Zixtel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

zixtel.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Zixtel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: