Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 48

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

zoomproject.net

株式会社ZOOMONE

Page Load Speed

6.1 sec in total

First Response

492 ms

Resources Loaded

5.2 sec

Page Rendered

370 ms

zoomproject.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to zoomproject.net homepage info - get ready to check Zoomproject best content right away, or after learning these important things about zoomproject.net

ZOOMONEでは、企業のPRプランニング、イベントのプロデュース、キャスティング、映像・WEB・グラフィックなどのコンテンツ制作までワンストップで行っています。

Visit zoomproject.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Zoomproject.net page load time and found that the first response time was 492 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

zoomproject.net performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value23.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.6 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value180 ms

92/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.593

11/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.0 s

64/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

zoomproject.net

492 ms

zoomone.jp

1968 ms

reset.css

175 ms

style.css

346 ms

sp-style.css

346 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Zoomproject.net, 82% (31 requests) were made to Zoomone.jp and 8% (3 requests) were made to Fast.fonts.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source Zoomone.jp.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 510.3 kB (10%)

Content Size

5.1 MB

After Optimization

4.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Zoomproject.net main page is 5.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 11.2 kB

  • Original 15.4 kB
  • After minification 13.7 kB
  • After compression 4.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.7 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 485.3 kB

  • Original 5.0 MB
  • After minification 4.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Zoomproject images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 9.3 kB

  • Original 73.4 kB
  • After minification 72.7 kB
  • After compression 64.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.3 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 4.4 kB

  • Original 16.7 kB
  • After minification 16.5 kB
  • After compression 12.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Zoomproject.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.4 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (43%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zoomproject. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

zoomproject.net accessibility score

48

Accessibility Issues

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

zoomproject.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

zoomproject.net SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Zoomproject.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Zoomproject.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Zoomproject. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: