12.6 sec in total
661 ms
11.7 sec
235 ms
Visit infac.com now to see the best up-to-date Infac content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about infac.com
Visit infac.comWe analyzed Infac.com page load time and found that the first response time was 661 ms and then it took 12 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
infac.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.4 s
1/100
10%
Value17.4 s
0/100
25%
Value12.8 s
3/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.395
26/100
15%
Value10.1 s
26/100
10%
661 ms
665 ms
435 ms
1722 ms
626 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Infac.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Infac.com.
Page size can be reduced by 241.2 kB (33%)
722.6 kB
481.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Infac.com main page is 722.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 447.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.7 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Infac images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 129.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 129.8 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 65.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Infac.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 65.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (44%)
96
54
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Infac. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
infac.com
661 ms
index.asp
665 ms
base.css
435 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
1722 ms
jquery.jscrollpane.min.js
626 ms
jquery.tinyscrollbar.js
863 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
864 ms
scroll.js
1766 ms
index.js
1082 ms
flash_object.js
1294 ms
reset.css
4262 ms
layout.css
1392 ms
main.css
988 ms
bbs.css
1090 ms
sub.css
1828 ms
jquery.jscrollpane.css
1303 ms
line_bg.png
215 ms
logo.jpg
221 ms
menu01.jpg
217 ms
s_menu_bg.png
209 ms
s1_menu01.png
215 ms
s1_menu02.png
218 ms
s1_menu03.png
411 ms
s1_menu04.png
425 ms
s1_menu05.png
433 ms
s1_menu08.png
439 ms
s1_menu06.png
435 ms
s1_s6_title01.png
436 ms
s1_s6_menu01.png
1826 ms
s1_s6_menu03.png
643 ms
s1_s6_menu04.png
647 ms
s1_s6_menu05.png
645 ms
s1_s6_title02.png
662 ms
s1_s6_menu06.png
652 ms
s1_s6_menu07.png
859 ms
s1_s6_menu08.png
860 ms
s1_s6_menu09.png
862 ms
s1_s6_menu10.png
864 ms
s1_s6_menu11.png
883 ms
s1_menu07.png
1499 ms
menu02.jpg
1599 ms
s2_menu01.png
2143 ms
sub_txt01.png
1094 ms
sub_txt02.png
1110 ms
sub_txt03.png
1758 ms
s2_menu02.png
1322 ms
sub_txt04.png
2219 ms
sub_txt05.png
1719 ms
sub_txt08.png
2302 ms
s2_menu03.png
1929 ms
sub_txt06.png
1976 ms
sub_txt07.png
2026 ms
sub_txt09.png
1939 ms
s2_menu04.png
2440 ms
sub_txt10.png
2035 ms
sub_txt11.png
2154 ms
sub_txt12.png
2146 ms
s2_menu05.png
2220 ms
sub_txt13.png
2049 ms
s2_menu06.png
2093 ms
sub_txt16.png
2146 ms
sub_txt15.png
2145 ms
sub_txt14.png
2236 ms
sub_txt17.png
2237 ms
sub_txt18.png
2087 ms
menu03.jpg
2152 ms
s3_menu05.png
2149 ms
s3_menu06.png
2210 ms
s3_menu07.png
2226 ms
menu04.jpg
2027 ms
s4_menu02.png
2084 ms
s4_menu03.png
2145 ms
s4_menu04.png
2158 ms
menu05.jpg
2201 ms
s5_menu01.png
2005 ms
s5_menu02.png
2016 ms
s5_menu03.png
1850 ms
s5_menu04.png
1724 ms
s5_menu05.png
1643 ms
menu06.jpg
1588 ms
s6_menu01.png
1555 ms
s6_menu04.png
1536 ms
s6_menu03.png
1452 ms
menu07.jpg
1455 ms
site_txt03.png
1422 ms
affiliate01.png
1379 ms
affiliate02.png
1376 ms
affiliate03.png
1352 ms
affiliate04.png
1343 ms
section01.png
1562 ms
section02_01.png
1315 ms
section02_02.png
2763 ms
section03_01.png
1548 ms
notice.png
1328 ms
m_visual.jpg
3579 ms
main_bg01.jpg
1319 ms
section03_02.png
1422 ms
btb_more.jpg
2092 ms
infac.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
infac.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
infac.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
KO
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Infac.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Korean. Our system also found out that Infac.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
infac.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Infac. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: