7.6 sec in total
1.4 sec
5.3 sec
839 ms
Welcome to nanoscreen.com homepage info - get ready to check Nano Screen best content right away, or after learning these important things about nanoscreen.com
NanoScreen serves pharmaceutical, genetic screening, research & other industries with the best quality liquid handling workstations & accessories.Learn more
Visit nanoscreen.comWe analyzed Nanoscreen.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
nanoscreen.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.6 s
0/100
10%
Value13.1 s
0/100
25%
Value14.8 s
1/100
10%
Value7,680 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.23
54/100
15%
Value19.8 s
2/100
10%
1421 ms
247 ms
164 ms
260 ms
295 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Nanoscreen.com, 25% (25 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 7% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Salesiq.zoho.com.
Page size can be reduced by 456.6 kB (30%)
1.5 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Nanoscreen.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 818.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nano Screen images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 340.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 340.5 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nanoscreen.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (79%)
89
19
The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nano Screen. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.nanoscreen.com
1421 ms
js
247 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
164 ms
twentyfifteen.css
260 ms
style.min.css
295 ms
theme.min.css
298 ms
vendors-style.css
298 ms
style.css
274 ms
styles.css
258 ms
core_style.css
183 ms
light_style.css
181 ms
dashicons.min.css
291 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
301 ms
woocommerce.css
335 ms
front.min.css
248 ms
css
341 ms
genericons.css
310 ms
style.css
177 ms
blocks.css
252 ms
default.min.css
294 ms
jquery-ui.theme.min.css
379 ms
squelch-tabs-and-accordions.css
337 ms
jetpack.css
311 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
362 ms
jquery.js
373 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
331 ms
rmp-menu.js
371 ms
bluebird.js
371 ms
s-202240.js
289 ms
css
386 ms
conversion.js
336 ms
0c6a17151fcf4f53815d3e7d37be242c.js
299 ms
formalyze_init.js
294 ms
formalyze_call_secure.js
425 ms
scripts.js
368 ms
collapse.js
368 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
378 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
383 ms
js.cookie.min.js
384 ms
woocommerce.min.js
383 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
383 ms
checkout.js
382 ms
paypal-express-checkout.js
411 ms
underscore.min.js
417 ms
front.min.js
416 ms
expressCheckout.min.js
413 ms
mailchimp-woocommerce-public.min.js
412 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
412 ms
functions.js
413 ms
core.min.js
416 ms
widget.min.js
413 ms
accordion.min.js
413 ms
tabs.min.js
413 ms
squelch-tabs-and-accordions.js
409 ms
wp-embed.min.js
415 ms
e-202240.js
272 ms
style.css
259 ms
structure.css
256 ms
access.css
254 ms
js
133 ms
analytics.js
193 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
180 ms
fbevents.js
178 ms
float.ls
671 ms
149 ms
353 ms
nanoscreen-logo-white.png
113 ms
nanoscreen-bg.jpg
146 ms
feature-custom-oem.jpg
149 ms
feature-dispense-head.jpg
149 ms
feature-robotic.jpg
144 ms
most-reliable-tips.jpg
112 ms
fast-quality.jpg
148 ms
timeline-update-2018.jpg
147 ms
best-source-2.jpg
316 ms
testimonial.jpg
317 ms
longtime-customers.jpg
317 ms
ga6Iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNfFkWbQ.ttf
252 ms
ga6Law1J5X9T9RW6j9bNdOwzfRmedA.ttf
383 ms
o-0IIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNr6zRF.ttf
395 ms
o-0NIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNjXhFVatyE.ttf
394 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYA.ttf
384 ms
ga6Kaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNfFImZDC-.ttf
394 ms
ga6Vaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNfFIu0RWufeVJ.ttf
411 ms
collect
210 ms
identity.js
178 ms
2176953472587935
439 ms
180 ms
16ca6ad53a3ab9529eaf2f23e.js
389 ms
pptm.js
399 ms
190 ms
widget
1580 ms
sf14g.js
130 ms
www.nanoscreen.com
1528 ms
111 ms
tracking
86 ms
ts
153 ms
floatsupportbtn_be794b86e12de3509d17b4da5f462a94_.css
161 ms
track_c885585ec5f876139e2683e71d5f524c_.js
189 ms
nanoscreen.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
nanoscreen.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
nanoscreen.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nanoscreen.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nanoscreen.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nanoscreen.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nano Screen. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: