9.2 sec in total
224 ms
7.8 sec
1.2 sec
Welcome to theproject-r.com homepage info - get ready to check The Project R best content right away, or after learning these important things about theproject-r.com
Visit theproject-r.comWe analyzed Theproject-r.com page load time and found that the first response time was 224 ms and then it took 9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
theproject-r.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value41.3 s
0/100
25%
Value20.0 s
0/100
10%
Value2,750 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.044
99/100
15%
Value25.4 s
0/100
10%
224 ms
2109 ms
358 ms
76 ms
329 ms
Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Theproject-r.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Theproject-r.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (7%)
20.2 MB
18.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Theproject-r.com main page is 20.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 19.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 271.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 271.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. The Project R images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Theproject-r.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (63%)
88
33
The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of The Project R. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
theproject-r.com
224 ms
theproject-r.com
2109 ms
style.css
358 ms
js
76 ms
hmn2fjt.css
329 ms
all.css
160 ms
js
121 ms
email-decode.min.js
19 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
362 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
294 ms
formreset.min.css
291 ms
formsmain.min.css
529 ms
readyclass.min.css
528 ms
browsers.min.css
631 ms
theme-ie11.min.css
630 ms
basic.min.css
756 ms
theme.min.css
844 ms
gtm4wp-contact-form-7-tracker.js
755 ms
jquery.min.js
893 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
934 ms
scripts.min.js
1024 ms
jquery.mobile.js
1021 ms
magnific-popup.js
1098 ms
salvattore.js
1072 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
1155 ms
common.js
1202 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1536 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
1290 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
1353 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1372 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1424 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1710 ms
dom-ready.min.js
1559 ms
hooks.min.js
1628 ms
i18n.min.js
1641 ms
a11y.min.js
1727 ms
jquery.json.min.js
1807 ms
gravityforms.min.js
1831 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
1936 ms
utils.min.js
2068 ms
ppf-configurator.js
314 ms
vinyl-configurator.js
627 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
2055 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
1975 ms
gtm.js
150 ms
css2
32 ms
fbevents.js
192 ms
gtm.js
192 ms
p.css
192 ms
155 ms
js
133 ms
analytics.js
211 ms
hotjar-3263246.js
337 ms
loader.js
207 ms
logo.png
1651 ms
preloader.gif
1648 ms
down.png
1651 ms
redcar3.png
1743 ms
untitled-31-1-scaled.jpg
2192 ms
Untitled1.jpg
2337 ms
DSC_1859.jpg
2151 ms
DSC_1903.jpg
2202 ms
172 ms
d
106 ms
d
139 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
138 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
176 ms
modules.ttf
1940 ms
Untitled2.jpg
2282 ms
collect
97 ms
collect
117 ms
call-tracking_7.js
61 ms
Untitled1-1.jpg
2574 ms
image1-5.jpeg
2684 ms
js
55 ms
modules.fd7a1c20a85f7a95e5ff.js
46 ms
DSC_9736-1.jpg
2572 ms
Untitled1.jpg
2567 ms
wcm
82 ms
DSC_8590.jpg
2510 ms
DSC_9769.jpg
2651 ms
XPEL_White-2048x557-1.png
2731 ms
Paint-Protection-FIlm-1.png
3144 ms
Paint-Protection-FIlm-1.jpg
3041 ms
Detailing.jpg
2976 ms
Vinyl-Mobile.png
2994 ms
Vinyl.jpg
3043 ms
unnamed-1.png
2784 ms
Xpel.png
3082 ms
Ultimate-Plus.png
2966 ms
Stealth.png
2976 ms
Avery-Den.png
2913 ms
Bottom_2.jpg
3301 ms
logo-footer.png
2945 ms
style.min.css
276 ms
style.min.css
215 ms
theproject-r.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
theproject-r.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
theproject-r.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Theproject-r.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Theproject-r.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
theproject-r.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of The Project R. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: