Tools & Wizards About Us
3-e.pl screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

3-e.pl

Custom software solutions for your business - 3e Software House

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

353 ms

Resources Loaded

947 ms

Page Rendered

277 ms

3-e.pl screenshot

About Website

Visit 3-e.pl now to see the best up-to-date 3 E content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 3-e.pl

High-quality custom business software. We ensure the continuous delivery of even the most complex software.

Visit 3-e.pl

Key Findings

We analyzed 3-e.pl page load time and found that the first response time was 353 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

3-e.pl performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.083

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.5 s

70/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

3-e.pl

353 ms

www.3e.pl

428 ms

css

56 ms

css

77 ms

css

86 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original 3-e.pl, 60% (12 requests) were made to Cdn.ampproject.org and 15% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (428 ms) relates to the external source 3e.pl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 125.2 kB (33%)

Content Size

377.7 kB

After Optimization

252.5 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of 3-e.pl main page is 377.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 265.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 90.5 kB

  • Original 111.9 kB
  • After minification 97.4 kB
  • After compression 21.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 34.8 kB

  • Original 265.8 kB
  • After minification 265.8 kB
  • After compression 231.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.8 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (73%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

4

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 3 E. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

3-e.pl

3-e.pl

353 ms

www.3e.pl

www.3e.pl

428 ms

css

css

56 ms

css

css

77 ms

css

css

86 ms

v0.js

v0.js

34 ms

amp-analytics-0.1.js

amp-analytics-0.1.js

49 ms

amp-sidebar-0.1.js

amp-sidebar-0.1.js

53 ms

amp-carousel-0.2.js

amp-carousel-0.2.js

59 ms

amp-iframe-0.1.js

amp-iframe-0.1.js

58 ms

amp-user-notification-0.1.js

amp-user-notification-0.1.js

54 ms

amp-install-serviceworker-0.1.js

amp-install-serviceworker-0.1.js

55 ms

amp-selector-0.1.js

amp-selector-0.1.js

54 ms

amp-youtube-0.1.js

amp-youtube-0.1.js

57 ms

amp-form-0.1.js

amp-form-0.1.js

60 ms

amp-mustache-0.2.js

amp-mustache-0.2.js

60 ms

amp-bind-0.1.js

amp-bind-0.1.js

63 ms

font

font

16 ms

font

font

29 ms

font

font

28 ms

Accessibility Review

3-e.pl accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

3-e.pl best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

3-e.pl SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 3-e.pl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 3-e.pl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

3-e.pl

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 3 E. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: