5.2 sec in total
432 ms
4.5 sec
269 ms
Click here to check amazing Active Web content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about activeweb.me
Web Design in Lebanon, Website Design in Lebanon, Website Development in Lebanon, website design Lebanon, web development in Lebanon, web design agencies Lebanon, web design companies in Lebanon, webs...
Visit activeweb.meWe analyzed Activeweb.me page load time and found that the first response time was 432 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
activeweb.me performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value7.5 s
26/100
10%
Value270 ms
82/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value10.7 s
22/100
10%
432 ms
76 ms
14 ms
548 ms
334 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Activeweb.me, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Activeweb.me.
Page size can be reduced by 115.1 kB (6%)
1.8 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Activeweb.me main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.1 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.3 kB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Active Web images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 39.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 39.9 kB or 51% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Activeweb.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.2 kB or 45% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (27%)
67
49
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Active Web. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
activeweb.me
432 ms
js
76 ms
ga.js
14 ms
main.css
548 ms
slick.css
334 ms
liquid-slider.css
441 ms
jquery-1.11.0.min.js
14 ms
slick.min.js
592 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js
398 ms
jquery.localscroll-1.2.7-min.js
395 ms
jquery.scrollTo-1.4.2-min.js
644 ms
smooth-scroll.js
730 ms
jquery.cre-animate.js
723 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
46 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
69 ms
jquery.liquid-slider.min.js
793 ms
custom.js
877 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
css
21 ms
droidarabickufi.css
36 ms
icons.css
342 ms
animate.css
423 ms
aw-logo.png
325 ms
slide1.jpg
314 ms
slide5.jpg
411 ms
slide2.jpg
368 ms
slide3.jpg
320 ms
web-icon.png
361 ms
mob-icon.png
677 ms
soc-icon.png
682 ms
seo-icon.png
613 ms
cloud-icon.png
681 ms
slide4.jpg
717 ms
overlay-02.png
723 ms
overlay-03.png
880 ms
riviera.png
1043 ms
samoa.png
1023 ms
unesco.png
1020 ms
merck.png
1052 ms
capmor.png
1025 ms
jaune.png
1146 ms
mofa.png
1303 ms
lpa.png
1322 ms
client-01.png
1317 ms
client-02.png
1346 ms
client-03.png
1347 ms
client-04.png
1444 ms
client-05.png
1611 ms
client-06.png
1614 ms
client-07.png
1624 ms
client-08.png
1676 ms
client-09.png
1651 ms
client-10.png
1758 ms
client-11.png
1927 ms
client-12.png
1931 ms
beeco.png
1962 ms
riviera.png
1996 ms
ruwad.png
1915 ms
font
89 ms
font
96 ms
icomoon.ttf
1938 ms
equip.png
1940 ms
jaune.png
1987 ms
aurora.png
1965 ms
uae.png
1963 ms
project-01.png
1958 ms
testimonials.jpg
1901 ms
menu.png
1810 ms
cursor.png
1970 ms
cursor.cur
1874 ms
arrow-prev.png
1890 ms
arrow-next.png
1904 ms
icomoon.woff
485 ms
icomoon.svg
349 ms
activeweb.me accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
activeweb.me best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
activeweb.me SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a valid hreflang
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Activeweb.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Activeweb.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
activeweb.me
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Active Web. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: