7.2 sec in total
483 ms
5.5 sec
1.2 sec
Welcome to airline-bewertung.eu homepage info - get ready to check Airline Bewertung best content right away, or after learning these important things about airline-bewertung.eu
Hier finden Sie Airline Bewertungen und Erfahrungen von allen Fluggesellschaften weltweit. Fluggäste bewerten ihren Flug. Teilen auch Sie Ihre Erfahrungen.
Visit airline-bewertung.euWe analyzed Airline-bewertung.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 483 ms and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
airline-bewertung.eu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
4/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value2,040 ms
7/100
30%
Value1.528
0/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
483 ms
1306 ms
256 ms
191 ms
241 ms
Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Airline-bewertung.eu, 7% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Airline-bewertungen.eu.
Page size can be reduced by 174.5 kB (32%)
549.5 kB
375.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Airline-bewertung.eu main page is 549.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 349.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.6 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Airline Bewertung needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.6 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 70.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 70.3 kB or 20% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Airline-bewertung.eu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.1 kB or 22% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (62%)
92
35
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Airline Bewertung. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.airline-bewertungen.eu
483 ms
www.airline-bewertungen.eu
1306 ms
js
256 ms
shortcodes.css
191 ms
css
241 ms
css
556 ms
css
594 ms
css
594 ms
css
593 ms
font-awesome.css
570 ms
prettyPhoto.css
563 ms
revolution.css
776 ms
jquery.min.js
187 ms
jquery-1.2.3.pack.js
891 ms
runonload.js
664 ms
fb.js
667 ms
tutorial.js
663 ms
neu.js
661 ms
tutorial.css
767 ms
jquery-ui.css
546 ms
jquery-1.10.2.js
983 ms
jquery-ui.js
1344 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.js
912 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.css
916 ms
jquery.min.js
330 ms
frontend.css
915 ms
show_ads.js
548 ms
adsbygoogle.js
591 ms
jquery.js
1042 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
916 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
997 ms
jquery-easing-1.3.js
989 ms
jquery.mobilemenu.js
1004 ms
jquery.viewport.js
1060 ms
jquery.tabs.min.js
1072 ms
organictabs.jquery.js
1102 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.0-packed.js
1180 ms
jquery.flickr.min.js
1138 ms
jquery.tweet.min.js
1165 ms
jquery.cookie.js
1191 ms
shortcodes.js
1204 ms
custom.js
1248 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
1295 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1472 ms
style.css
1390 ms
responsive.css
1391 ms
style.css
1387 ms
lozad.min.js
531 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
524 ms
pattern15.jpg
128 ms
header-overlay.png
127 ms
logo.webp
236 ms
Airline-bewertung-1.webp
236 ms
Airline-bewertung-2.webp
235 ms
Airline-bewertung-3.webp
234 ms
mit-foto.gif
298 ms
condor.jpg
298 ms
etihad.jpg
300 ms
lufthansa.jpg
315 ms
emirates.jpg
314 ms
swiss.jpg
299 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJN7Ml2xMB.ttf
151 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJabMl2xMB.ttf
152 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ0LQl2xMB.ttf
215 ms
3qTvojGmgSyUukBzKslpBmt6.ttf
232 ms
3qTqojGmgSyUukBzKslhvU5q-WMQ.ttf
233 ms
pattern15.jpg
335 ms
404.php
337 ms
show_ads_impl.js
181 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
209 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
376 ms
cookie.js
100 ms
integrator.js
367 ms
ads
766 ms
ads
914 ms
ads
933 ms
zrt_lookup.html
702 ms
pattern15.jpg
436 ms
header-overlay.png
436 ms
footer-bg.jpg
438 ms
footer-overlay-bottom.png
436 ms
footer-info.jpg
435 ms
footer-nav-sep.png
435 ms
social-icons1.png
508 ms
footer-overlay-top.png
507 ms
ui-bg_glass_75_e6e6e6_1x400.png
320 ms
responsive-nav-bg.png
144 ms
loader.gif
130 ms
timer.png
131 ms
Airline-bewertung-1.webp
156 ms
Airline-bewertung-2.webp
239 ms
Airline-bewertung-3.webp
251 ms
shadow2.png
232 ms
ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png
53 ms
ui-icons_888888_256x240.png
52 ms
jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKA.ttf
51 ms
jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf
53 ms
pattern15.jpg
169 ms
light-bottom.css
143 ms
sodar
131 ms
large_left.png
170 ms
large_right.png
170 ms
Airline-bewertung-1.webp
209 ms
Airline-bewertung-2.webp
199 ms
Airline-bewertung-3.webp
169 ms
integrator.js
119 ms
airline-bewertung.eu accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
airline-bewertung.eu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
airline-bewertung.eu SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Airline-bewertung.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Airline-bewertung.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
airline-bewertung.eu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Airline Bewertung. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: