8.2 sec in total
2.3 sec
5.6 sec
330 ms
Visit al-pack.com now to see the best up-to-date AL PACK content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about al-pack.com
Visit al-pack.comWe analyzed Al-pack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
al-pack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value6.5 s
39/100
10%
Value140 ms
95/100
30%
Value1.1
1/100
15%
Value6.9 s
54/100
10%
2295 ms
187 ms
351 ms
497 ms
494 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Al-pack.com, 18% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Al-pack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 168.8 kB (12%)
1.4 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Al-pack.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 729.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 126.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 126.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. AL PACK images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Al-pack.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (82%)
60
11
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of AL PACK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
al-pack.com
2295 ms
style.min.css
187 ms
style.min.css
351 ms
style.min.css
497 ms
style.min.css
494 ms
style.min.css
455 ms
style.min.css
358 ms
dashicons.min.css
611 ms
animate.css
555 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
646 ms
prettyPhoto.css
729 ms
font-awesome.min.css
791 ms
css
44 ms
elegant-icons.css
741 ms
et-frontend.css
856 ms
et-responsive.css
947 ms
frontend-job-post-public.css
994 ms
css
40 ms
font-awesome.min.css
38 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1009 ms
fontawesome-iconpicker.min.css
1041 ms
css
40 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1121 ms
jquery-ui.css
1073 ms
simple-job-board-public.css
1170 ms
style.min.css
1126 ms
magnific_popup.css
1303 ms
swiper.css
1308 ms
popup.css
1229 ms
animate.css
1431 ms
readmore.css
1348 ms
jquery.min.js
1408 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1422 ms
isotope.js
1637 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
1612 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1539 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
1605 ms
wow.js
1699 ms
et-frontend.js
1788 ms
core.min.js
1624 ms
et-core-unified-5.min.css
1508 ms
mouse.min.js
1647 ms
sortable.min.js
1635 ms
bootstrap.min.js
14 ms
datepicker.min.js
1551 ms
frontend-job-post-public.js
1540 ms
intlTelInput.min.js
1734 ms
intlTelInput-utils.js
1564 ms
fontawesome-iconpicker.min.js
1676 ms
scripts.min.js
1426 ms
common.js
1701 ms
Retail_GarbageBags.jpg
561 ms
countless_products_box02.jpg
381 ms
balpex_logo.png
333 ms
Al-Pack_Manufacturing.jpg
837 ms
Marc_Landry.jpg
521 ms
Al-Pack_Custom_Kongsberg-1.jpg
593 ms
Global_Markets_PACsecure.gif
577 ms
Compost_Certifications.gif
595 ms
white_logo.png
685 ms
et-divi-dynamic-tb-28-5-late.css
886 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
16 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
24 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff
30 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
41 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff
40 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
41 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
38 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff
39 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
38 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
47 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff
48 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
48 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff
48 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
49 ms
modules.woff
1098 ms
al-pack.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
al-pack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
al-pack.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Al-pack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Al-pack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
al-pack.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of AL PACK. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: