5.6 sec in total
266 ms
4.8 sec
521 ms
Visit anfaca.org.mx now to see the best up-to-date Anfaca content for Mexico and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about anfaca.org.mx
Visit anfaca.org.mxWe analyzed Anfaca.org.mx page load time and found that the first response time was 266 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
anfaca.org.mx performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value54.9 s
0/100
25%
Value21.9 s
0/100
10%
Value11,980 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value33.7 s
0/100
10%
266 ms
1028 ms
48 ms
134 ms
208 ms
Our browser made a total of 161 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (114 requests) were addressed to the original Anfaca.org.mx, 14% (23 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (11 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Anfaca.org.mx.
Page size can be reduced by 291.2 kB (1%)
32.7 MB
32.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Anfaca.org.mx main page is 32.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 31.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 183.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Anfaca images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 10.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 8.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Anfaca.org.mx has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 99 (75%)
132
33
The browser has sent 132 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Anfaca. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 77 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
anfaca.org.mx
266 ms
anfaca.org.mx
1028 ms
css
48 ms
styles.css
134 ms
ihover.css
208 ms
style.css
219 ms
all.css
285 ms
settings.css
221 ms
widget-options.css
220 ms
style.css
224 ms
font-awesome.min.css
276 ms
style.min.css
282 ms
style.css
288 ms
dripicons.css
286 ms
stylesheet.min.css
448 ms
print.css
344 ms
webkit_stylesheet.css
350 ms
style_dynamic.css
352 ms
responsive.min.css
358 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
362 ms
js_composer.min.css
494 ms
custom_css.css
425 ms
jquery.min.js
522 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
428 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
533 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
568 ms
js
82 ms
css
36 ms
font-awesome.css
478 ms
hooks.min.js
499 ms
i18n.min.js
506 ms
index.js
510 ms
index.js
577 ms
qode-like.min.js
578 ms
core.min.js
578 ms
accordion.min.js
579 ms
menu.min.js
629 ms
dom-ready.min.js
630 ms
a11y.min.js
630 ms
autocomplete.min.js
630 ms
controlgroup.min.js
738 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
712 ms
button.min.js
647 ms
datepicker.min.js
645 ms
mouse.min.js
647 ms
resizable.min.js
644 ms
draggable.min.js
644 ms
dialog.min.js
664 ms
droppable.min.js
697 ms
progressbar.min.js
693 ms
selectable.min.js
662 ms
sortable.min.js
690 ms
slider.min.js
635 ms
spinner.min.js
649 ms
tooltip.min.js
721 ms
tabs.min.js
714 ms
effect.min.js
713 ms
effect-blind.min.js
650 ms
effect-bounce.min.js
648 ms
effect-clip.min.js
947 ms
effect-drop.min.js
1004 ms
effect-explode.min.js
993 ms
effect-fade.min.js
970 ms
effect-fold.min.js
972 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
973 ms
effect-pulsate.min.js
968 ms
effect-size.min.js
965 ms
effect-scale.min.js
898 ms
effect-shake.min.js
896 ms
effect-slide.min.js
898 ms
effect-transfer.min.js
898 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
160 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf
222 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf
257 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf
258 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf
257 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf
259 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf
258 ms
plugins.js
1070 ms
OBuaMp39pO4
318 ms
pyIcDDt-qT8
576 ms
60gNhDMqqvQ
857 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
849 ms
lemmon-slider.min.js
847 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
849 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
740 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
740 ms
SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-DPNkCo96.ttf
128 ms
SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-a_NkCo96.ttf
125 ms
SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-NfNkCo96.ttf
125 ms
SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-2fRkCo96.ttf
126 ms
SlGDmQSNjdsmc35JDF1K5E55YMjF_7DPuGi-6_RkCo96.ttf
127 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf
94 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf
94 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf
95 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aX8.ttf
119 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aX8.ttf
119 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf
119 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf
121 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf
123 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aX8.ttf
126 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
812 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
797 ms
jquery.stretch.js
797 ms
imagesloaded.js
796 ms
rangeslider.min.js
796 ms
jquery.event.move.js
843 ms
jquery.twentytwenty.js
773 ms
TweenLite.min.js
758 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
738 ms
smoothPageScroll.min.js
736 ms
default_dynamic.js
853 ms
www-player.css
24 ms
www-embed-player.js
57 ms
base.js
95 ms
default.min.js
1249 ms
custom_js.js
835 ms
comment-reply.min.js
759 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
758 ms
wordpress-homepage.min.js
757 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1159 ms
ad_status.js
515 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
998 ms
www-player.css
421 ms
www-embed-player.js
473 ms
base.js
593 ms
-0TfInu9ra9zkah2wyCD78KX7EDwI16Gf6-9m2UuzfU.js
511 ms
embed.js
325 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
712 ms
logo-anfaca.png
707 ms
logo_white.png
707 ms
Inicio-en-lugar-de-pollos-boton-Servicios.jpeg
1023 ms
Inicio-cambiar-puercos-boton-socios-scaled.jpeg
716 ms
Inicio-en-lugar-de-Vaca-boton-Nosotros-scaled.jpeg
713 ms
Carrusel-principal-04-mascotas-scaled.jpg
707 ms
Inicio-en-lugar-de-borregos-boton-Directorio-scaled.jpeg
911 ms
0.-ANFACA_AdobeStock_357220612-1.jpeg
2004 ms
Carrusel-principal-06-caballos-scaled.jpeg
706 ms
Que-es-ANFACA-847x847.jpeg
708 ms
Brasil-2024.jpg
906 ms
ANFACA-IPADE-2024-jul.jpg
905 ms
Calendario-scaled-e1705345914520.jpeg
903 ms
logo-anfaca-white-150x150.png
1016 ms
vaca-background-.jpg
1118 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
131 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
133 ms
id
297 ms
Create
715 ms
Create
721 ms
id
310 ms
Create
352 ms
embed.js
24 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
143 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
145 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
145 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
147 ms
GenerateIT
260 ms
GenerateIT
263 ms
GenerateIT
170 ms
loader.gif
71 ms
revicons.woff
74 ms
anfaca.org.mx accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
anfaca.org.mx best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
anfaca.org.mx SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Anfaca.org.mx can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Anfaca.org.mx main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
anfaca.org.mx
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Anfaca. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: