Tools & Wizards About Us
antiviruscompared.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

antiviruscompared.com

AntivirusCompared - Finding the Best Antivirus for You

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

80 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

531 ms

antiviruscompared.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to antiviruscompared.com homepage info - get ready to check Antivirus Compared best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about antiviruscompared.com

Antivirus Compared provides in-depth reviews and detailed comparisons of all the antivirus programs available, conveniently under one roof.

Visit antiviruscompared.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Antiviruscompared.com page load time and found that the first response time was 80 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

antiviruscompared.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

57/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,460 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.3 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.antiviruscompared.com

80 ms

css_browser_selector.js

33 ms

js

80 ms

ranking_design_general.css

28 ms

mobile_direct_ads.css

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Antiviruscompared.com, 48% (42 requests) were made to Cdn.nichesites.pikoya.com and 24% (21 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (619 ms) relates to the external source Facebook.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 67.2 kB (12%)

Content Size

552.1 kB

After Optimization

484.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Antiviruscompared.com main page is 552.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 438.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 61.2 kB

  • Original 74.6 kB
  • After minification 71.4 kB
  • After compression 13.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 438.7 kB
  • After minification 432.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Antivirus Compared images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 40 B

  • Original 24.6 kB
  • After minification 24.6 kB
  • After compression 24.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 70 B

  • Original 14.2 kB
  • After minification 14.2 kB
  • After compression 14.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Antiviruscompared.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (39%)

Requests Now

87

After Optimization

53

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Antivirus Compared. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.antiviruscompared.com

www.antiviruscompared.com

80 ms

css_browser_selector.js

css_browser_selector.js

33 ms

js

js

80 ms

ranking_design_general.css

ranking_design_general.css

28 ms

mobile_direct_ads.css

mobile_direct_ads.css

31 ms

ranking_design_style.css

ranking_design_style.css

104 ms

mobile_ranking_design_general.css

mobile_ranking_design_general.css

34 ms

bg.png

bg.png

101 ms

fbds.js

fbds.js

25 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

55 ms

bg_pattern.png

bg_pattern.png

14 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

13 ms

logo.png

logo.png

86 ms

search.png

search.png

80 ms

m_menu.png

m_menu.png

18 ms

fb_button.png

fb_button.png

18 ms

title_page.jpg

title_page.jpg

81 ms

title_page.jpg

title_page.jpg

81 ms

title_page.jpg

title_page.jpg

140 ms

title_page.jpg

title_page.jpg

80 ms

short_about.png

short_about.png

161 ms

square.jpg

square.jpg

139 ms

square.jpg

square.jpg

141 ms

square.jpg

square.jpg

141 ms

square.jpg

square.jpg

157 ms

square.jpg

square.jpg

174 ms

square.jpg

square.jpg

173 ms

square.jpg

square.jpg

181 ms

large.jpg

large.jpg

181 ms

large.jpg

large.jpg

218 ms

large.jpg

large.jpg

218 ms

37.jpg

37.jpg

223 ms

article_image.jpg

article_image.jpg

242 ms

article_image.jpg

article_image.jpg

233 ms

article_image.jpg

article_image.jpg

235 ms

article_image.jpg

article_image.jpg

305 ms

41.jpg

41.jpg

220 ms

10511.jpg

10511.jpg

281 ms

10266.jpg

10266.jpg

270 ms

10082.jpg

10082.jpg

451 ms

9539.jpg

9539.jpg

301 ms

side_block.jpg

side_block.jpg

301 ms

side_block.jpg

side_block.jpg

345 ms

side_block.jpg

side_block.jpg

556 ms

side_block.jpg

side_block.jpg

408 ms

bg_pattern.png

bg_pattern.png

87 ms

fb_white.jpg

fb_white.jpg

42 ms

side_block.jpg

side_block.jpg

370 ms

side_block.jpg

side_block.jpg

342 ms

footer_logo.png

footer_logo.png

404 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

67 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

9 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

7 ms

31 ms

like.php

like.php

97 ms

like.php

like.php

165 ms

like.php

like.php

121 ms

like.php

like.php

136 ms

like.php

like.php

236 ms

like.php

like.php

246 ms

like.php

like.php

225 ms

like.php

like.php

328 ms

like_box.php

like_box.php

619 ms

32 ms

28 ms

k4GAxvzcPO_.js

k4GAxvzcPO_.js

38 ms

FEppCFCt76d.png

FEppCFCt76d.png

37 ms

Ql-UNnxapLj.css

Ql-UNnxapLj.css

6 ms

c5GOUJ31za3.css

c5GOUJ31za3.css

7 ms

WglDWgsNzd8.css

WglDWgsNzd8.css

12 ms

dvL-mSr_f6M.js

dvL-mSr_f6M.js

14 ms

FsgTKAP125G.js

FsgTKAP125G.js

37 ms

pLoSlJD7y1F.js

pLoSlJD7y1F.js

39 ms

o1ndYS2og_B.js

o1ndYS2og_B.js

45 ms

Glud--w-qOK.js

Glud--w-qOK.js

45 ms

WvbRbK9sYiL.js

WvbRbK9sYiL.js

42 ms

p55HfXW__mM.js

p55HfXW__mM.js

49 ms

ALTQi95mOyD.js

ALTQi95mOyD.js

43 ms

r5HcOUY3OX6.js

r5HcOUY3OX6.js

56 ms

DtR0X5vxkLl.js

DtR0X5vxkLl.js

53 ms

8IAOdJiZGNE.js

8IAOdJiZGNE.js

47 ms

yhMLxgtMNUo.js

yhMLxgtMNUo.js

54 ms

daRG11v-d-4.js

daRG11v-d-4.js

51 ms

HzxD9aAXSyD.js

HzxD9aAXSyD.js

53 ms

355836932_277347544800243_4711089924048308232_n.png

355836932_277347544800243_4711089924048308232_n.png

142 ms

Z5pveUhzVtX.js

Z5pveUhzVtX.js

10 ms

355706472_277347541466910_1693634173241986275_n.png

355706472_277347541466910_1693634173241986275_n.png

30 ms

UXtr_j2Fwe-.png

UXtr_j2Fwe-.png

3 ms

Accessibility Review

antiviruscompared.com accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

antiviruscompared.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

antiviruscompared.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Antiviruscompared.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Antiviruscompared.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

antiviruscompared.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Antivirus Compared. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: