5.2 sec in total
764 ms
4.1 sec
340 ms
Click here to check amazing Architectural Site content for Japan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about architectural-site.jp
建築関係の方、必見です。あらゆるノウハウが満載です。工種をカテゴリー別に分類しています。作業手順などを写真、ビデオでわかりやすくまとめています。
Visit architectural-site.jpWe analyzed Architectural-site.jp page load time and found that the first response time was 764 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
architectural-site.jp performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value12.7 s
0/100
25%
Value11.6 s
4/100
10%
Value3,030 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.332
34/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
764 ms
347 ms
370 ms
371 ms
372 ms
Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 31% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Architectural-site.jp, 9% (9 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 8% (8 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 355.8 kB (41%)
870.2 kB
514.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Architectural-site.jp main page is 870.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 342.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 79.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Architectural Site images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 161.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 161.5 kB or 50% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 87.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Architectural-site.jp needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 87.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (60%)
98
39
The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Architectural Site. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
architectural-site.jp
764 ms
style.css
347 ms
skin.css
370 ms
styles.css
371 ms
wpp.css
372 ms
jetpack.css
374 ms
prototype.js
68 ms
scriptaculous.js
80 ms
effects.js
91 ms
lightbox-resize.js
479 ms
jquery.js
847 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
685 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
684 ms
slidedeck.jquery.lite.pack.js
701 ms
style-add.css
699 ms
menu-style.css
830 ms
menu_jquery.js
1011 ms
adsbygoogle.js
17 ms
brand
30 ms
counter.js
517 ms
brand
65 ms
photon.js
876 ms
jquery.form.min.js
874 ms
scripts.js
915 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
54 ms
gprofiles.js
57 ms
wpgroho.js
1019 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1039 ms
e-201609.js
4 ms
base.js
1205 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1017 ms
builder.js
10 ms
effects.js
12 ms
dragdrop.js
21 ms
controls.js
23 ms
slider.js
28 ms
sound.js
30 ms
lightbox.css
505 ms
css
24 ms
b62b2087811d29e5b005951a630bdc26.jpg
1754 ms
rishin07.jpg
1492 ms
genba80_15_2.gif
687 ms
kensetugyou80_15_2.gif
686 ms
eb9259c73b343b4d6ef82dc52e911457.jpg
2039 ms
R0012103.jpg
2099 ms
sp_bg-20140202.jpg
686 ms
cropped-201105141.jpg
344 ms
caret.png
259 ms
cropped-cropped-IMG_3268.jpg
684 ms
2950-featured-100x100.jpg
346 ms
177-featured-100x100.jpg
359 ms
7885-featured-100x100.jpg
684 ms
872-featured-100x100.jpg
683 ms
ca-pub-7096876815575163.js
55 ms
zrt_lookup.html
52 ms
show_ads_impl.js
59 ms
ca3.png
601 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
83 ms
ads
233 ms
osd.js
26 ms
widgets.js
89 ms
ads
194 ms
ads
280 ms
13
206 ms
ads
195 ms
ads
416 ms
ads
423 ms
abg.js
23 ms
0.gif
263 ms
5.gif
450 ms
2.gif
437 ms
1.gif
437 ms
4.gif
420 ms
count.js
22 ms
ga.js
29 ms
__utm.gif
166 ms
css
209 ms
m_js_controller.js
135 ms
g.gif
160 ms
hovercard.css
134 ms
services.css
137 ms
timeline.1b43d11859b7663a2225b885f87704a5.js
235 ms
4694766977475054163
68 ms
s
63 ms
redir.html
133 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
117 ms
x_button_blue2.png
77 ms
5171746271700867932
55 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
21 ms
MdyApZkAHG2-UELdOwjNjjFZXSz-CGj4o1JtDR7aGgs.js
28 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
111 ms
iframe.html
22 ms
syndication
93 ms
404467567089053696
491 ms
timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css
30 ms
timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css
109 ms
____facebook20120128_normal.jpg
131 ms
CXTJs1sUEAAQmEi.jpg:small
149 ms
jot
27 ms
activeview
14 ms
activeview
20 ms
architectural-site.jp accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
architectural-site.jp best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
architectural-site.jp SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Architectural-site.jp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Architectural-site.jp main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
architectural-site.jp
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Architectural Site. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: