Tools & Wizards About Us
armstrong-firm.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

armstrong-firm.com

Home - The Armstrong Firm

Page Load Speed

783 ms in total

First Response

29 ms

Resources Loaded

595 ms

Page Rendered

159 ms

armstrong-firm.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Armstrong Firm content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about armstrong-firm.com

Visit armstrong-firm.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Armstrong-firm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 754 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

armstrong-firm.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value810 ms

36/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.045

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

armstrong-firm.com

29 ms

armstrong-firm.com

130 ms

js_composer.min.css

27 ms

main.min.css

42 ms

icomoon-the7-font.min.css

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Armstrong-firm.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (207 ms) belongs to the original domain Armstrong-firm.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 67.5 kB (15%)

Content Size

442.2 kB

After Optimization

374.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Armstrong-firm.com main page is 442.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 220.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 63.8 kB

  • Original 80.7 kB
  • After minification 78.8 kB
  • After compression 16.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 141.2 kB
  • After minification 138.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Armstrong Firm images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 220.3 kB
  • After minification 220.3 kB
  • After compression 219.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (85%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Armstrong Firm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

armstrong-firm.com

armstrong-firm.com

29 ms

armstrong-firm.com

armstrong-firm.com

130 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

27 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

42 ms

icomoon-the7-font.min.css

icomoon-the7-font.min.css

39 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

79 ms

back-compat.min.css

back-compat.min.css

54 ms

wpbakery.min.css

wpbakery.min.css

70 ms

custom.css

custom.css

57 ms

media.css

media.css

67 ms

mega-menu.css

mega-menu.css

81 ms

style.css

style.css

71 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

104 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

94 ms

css

css

71 ms

above-the-fold.min.js

above-the-fold.min.js

100 ms

formreset.min.css

formreset.min.css

93 ms

formsmain.min.css

formsmain.min.css

94 ms

readyclass.min.css

readyclass.min.css

93 ms

browsers.min.css

browsers.min.css

94 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

95 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

94 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

94 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

95 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

95 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

96 ms

conditional_logic.min.js

conditional_logic.min.js

95 ms

api.js

api.js

94 ms

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

95 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

95 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

207 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

205 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

204 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

203 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

203 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

205 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

204 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

199 ms

crisp_paper_ruffles.jpg

crisp_paper_ruffles.jpg

100 ms

armstrong-firm-logo.png

armstrong-firm-logo.png

100 ms

Heber-Longhorn-Sunset.jpg

Heber-Longhorn-Sunset.jpg

101 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

99 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

162 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

168 ms

icomoon-the7-font.ttf

icomoon-the7-font.ttf

101 ms

r05XGLJT86YzEZ7o.ttf

r05XGLJT86YzEZ7o.ttf

197 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

170 ms

Accessibility Review

armstrong-firm.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

armstrong-firm.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

armstrong-firm.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Armstrong-firm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Armstrong-firm.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

armstrong-firm.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Armstrong Firm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: