Tools & Wizards About Us
arrt.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 74

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

arrt.org

ARRT.org Home Page - ARRT

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

334 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

277 ms

arrt.org screenshot

About Website

Visit arrt.org now to see the best up-to-date ARRT content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about arrt.org

Welcome to ARRT's website. Learn about us, the work we do, and the credentials we offer. If you're an R.T., log in to complete business with us.

Visit arrt.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Arrt.org page load time and found that the first response time was 334 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

arrt.org performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

77/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.arrt.org

334 ms

css

77 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

67 ms

44e14c5b56.js

92 ms

styles.min.css

166 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Arrt.org, 21% (5 requests) were made to Assets-us-01.kc-usercontent.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (482 ms) relates to the external source Rum-static.pingdom.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 126.5 kB (12%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

924.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Arrt.org main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 880.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 59.3 kB

  • Original 68.2 kB
  • After minification 48.0 kB
  • After compression 8.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.2 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 47.1 kB

  • Original 880.5 kB
  • After minification 833.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ARRT images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 8.5 kB

  • Original 62.1 kB
  • After minification 62.1 kB
  • After compression 53.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.5 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 11.6 kB

  • Original 39.7 kB
  • After minification 39.7 kB
  • After compression 28.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Arrt.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.6 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (43%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ARRT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.arrt.org

www.arrt.org

334 ms

css

css

77 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

67 ms

44e14c5b56.js

44e14c5b56.js

92 ms

styles.min.css

styles.min.css

166 ms

primary-js-bundle.min.js

primary-js-bundle.min.js

254 ms

BackToTop.js

BackToTop.js

353 ms

IEModal.js

IEModal.js

353 ms

pa-5d9cd3d605a241000800057c.js

pa-5d9cd3d605a241000800057c.js

482 ms

js

js

94 ms

siteanalyze_6185908.js

siteanalyze_6185908.js

83 ms

arrt-banner-1950x500_we-certify-and-register.jpeg

arrt-banner-1950x500_we-certify-and-register.jpeg

98 ms

Close.png

Close.png

195 ms

ARRT_logo.png

ARRT_logo.png

193 ms

ARRT_logo500x500.png

ARRT_logo500x500.png

196 ms

volunteer-circle.png

volunteer-circle.png

207 ms

instructor-circle.png

instructor-circle.png

208 ms

RT%20circle%20image.png

RT%20circle%20image.png

208 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

146 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

163 ms

userinfo

userinfo

111 ms

ARRT_logo_w_text.png

ARRT_logo_w_text.png

184 ms

js

js

67 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

61 ms

Accessibility Review

arrt.org accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

arrt.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

arrt.org SEO score

74

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Arrt.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Arrt.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

arrt.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ARRT. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: