2.8 sec in total
425 ms
2.1 sec
258 ms
Visit asemb.com now to see the best up-to-date Asemb content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about asemb.com
Screen Printing Embroidery and Promotional Products for your business. Serving New Jersey and Pennsylvania.
Visit asemb.comWe analyzed Asemb.com page load time and found that the first response time was 425 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
asemb.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value11.0 s
0/100
25%
Value8.4 s
18/100
10%
Value1,800 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value16.0 s
6/100
10%
425 ms
177 ms
175 ms
188 ms
195 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Asemb.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (686 ms) relates to the external source Aandsscreenprinting.com.
Page size can be reduced by 210.7 kB (8%)
2.7 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Asemb.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 83.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Asemb images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 47.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 47.7 kB or 15% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Asemb.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (39%)
79
48
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Asemb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.aandsscreenprinting.com
425 ms
bootstrap.min.css
177 ms
flexslider.css
175 ms
font-awesome.min.css
188 ms
slick.css
195 ms
lightbox.css
175 ms
vex.css
165 ms
vex-theme-default.css
307 ms
StyleSheet
318 ms
Pic
283 ms
Utils.js
228 ms
jquery.min.js
387 ms
migrate-3.1.0.js
296 ms
bootstrap.min.js
312 ms
slick.min.js
331 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
333 ms
superfish.min.js
387 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
387 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
396 ms
lightbox.js
396 ms
ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js
395 ms
iframeResizer.min.js
395 ms
IFrameUtils.js
395 ms
vex.combined.js
424 ms
custom.js
438 ms
highslide-full.packed.js
444 ms
highslide.config.js
443 ms
highslide.css
442 ms
css
25 ms
05ATRG6xtHU
151 ms
close.png
76 ms
loading.gif
145 ms
prev.png
146 ms
next.png
146 ms
Pic
432 ms
Pic
488 ms
Pic
431 ms
QPic
150 ms
QPic
175 ms
QPic
338 ms
QPic
202 ms
QPic
428 ms
QPic
428 ms
QPic
429 ms
QPic
429 ms
QPic
431 ms
QPic
433 ms
QPic
462 ms
QPic
461 ms
QPic
461 ms
QPic
461 ms
QPic
461 ms
QPic
500 ms
QPic
466 ms
QPic
466 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7j.woff
37 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
455 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
478 ms
QPic
585 ms
QPic
586 ms
QPic
587 ms
QPic
586 ms
QPic
557 ms
QPic
547 ms
QPic
542 ms
QPic
543 ms
WEBlogPic
636 ms
WEBlogPic
686 ms
WEBlogPic
636 ms
Pic
572 ms
www-player.css
5 ms
www-embed-player.js
31 ms
base.js
55 ms
adminkeys.png
568 ms
slick.woff
564 ms
ajax-loader.gif
584 ms
ad_status.js
169 ms
0eec19jyZJIq-Yrvpx_JX6MyT7H4xziZcfWMUzmhD74.js
117 ms
embed.js
38 ms
id
36 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
34 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
39 ms
Create
129 ms
GenerateIT
14 ms
custom.png
36 ms
zoomout.cur
34 ms
loader.white.gif
35 ms
asemb.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
ARIA IDs are not unique
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
asemb.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
asemb.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Asemb.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Asemb.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
asemb.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Asemb. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: