Tools & Wizards About Us
ashmoreconsulting.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

ashmoreconsulting.com

Construction Law Experts | Specialist Contractors Building Law Advice

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

252 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

200 ms

ashmoreconsulting.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ashmoreconsulting.com homepage info - get ready to check Ashmoreconsulting best content right away, or after learning these important things about ashmoreconsulting.com

Ashmore Consulting are experts in construction law for Specialist Contractors. Providing expertise in dispute resolution, contractual & commercial problem solving, contract evaluation & drafting and b...

Visit ashmoreconsulting.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ashmoreconsulting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 252 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ashmoreconsulting.com performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

87/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.196

63/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.2 s

85/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ashmoreconsulting.com

252 ms

ashmoreconsulting.com

314 ms

www.ashmoreconsulting.com

500 ms

style.css

78 ms

jquery.js

232 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Ashmoreconsulting.com, 22% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (500 ms) belongs to the original domain Ashmoreconsulting.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 48.5 kB (9%)

Content Size

522.1 kB

After Optimization

473.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ashmoreconsulting.com main page is 522.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 371.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 21.2 kB

  • Original 26.7 kB
  • After minification 22.4 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.3 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

  • Original 371.5 kB
  • After minification 365.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ashmoreconsulting images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 14.5 kB

  • Original 101.8 kB
  • After minification 101.8 kB
  • After compression 87.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 14.5 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 7.0 kB

  • Original 22.0 kB
  • After minification 22.0 kB
  • After compression 15.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ashmoreconsulting.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.0 kB or 32% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (54%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ashmoreconsulting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ashmoreconsulting.com

ashmoreconsulting.com

252 ms

ashmoreconsulting.com

ashmoreconsulting.com

314 ms

www.ashmoreconsulting.com

www.ashmoreconsulting.com

500 ms

style.css

style.css

78 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

232 ms

meanmenu.js

meanmenu.js

230 ms

themepunch.plugins.min.js

themepunch.plugins.min.js

308 ms

themepunch.revolution.min.js

themepunch.revolution.min.js

314 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

237 ms

reset.css

reset.css

162 ms

meanmenu.css

meanmenu.css

229 ms

buttons.css

buttons.css

230 ms

columns.css

columns.css

237 ms

images.css

images.css

240 ms

searchbox.css

searchbox.css

304 ms

vallenato.css

vallenato.css

306 ms

revolutionslider.css

revolutionslider.css

310 ms

googlemap.css

googlemap.css

314 ms

css

css

29 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

316 ms

bg.png

bg.png

89 ms

logo.png

logo.png

90 ms

images3.jpg

images3.jpg

235 ms

images1.jpg

images1.jpg

226 ms

images2.jpg

images2.jpg

329 ms

bg-maincont.png

bg-maincont.png

89 ms

image-home.jpg

image-home.jpg

152 ms

5live.jpg

5live.jpg

154 ms

accord-img-1.jpg

accord-img-1.jpg

233 ms

accord-plus.png

accord-plus.png

231 ms

accord-minus.png

accord-minus.png

231 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

305 ms

timer.png

timer.png

329 ms

small_left.png

small_left.png

327 ms

small_right.png

small_right.png

328 ms

5aUz9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt7VptuA.ttf

5aUz9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt7VptuA.ttf

17 ms

5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5alOqEp2jg.ttf

5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5alOqEp2jg.ttf

41 ms

5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5fFPqEp2jg.ttf

5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5fFPqEp2jg.ttf

63 ms

5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5eFIqEp2jg.ttf

5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5eFIqEp2jg.ttf

67 ms

5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5f1LqEp2jg.ttf

5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5f1LqEp2jg.ttf

86 ms

5aUo9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt7V9VBEhGiU9D.ttf

5aUo9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt7V9VBEhGiU9D.ttf

103 ms

5aUo9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt7V9VGEtGiU9D.ttf

5aUo9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt7V9VGEtGiU9D.ttf

102 ms

5aUo9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt7V9VTE5GiU9D.ttf

5aUo9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt7V9VTE5GiU9D.ttf

86 ms

5aUt9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt7V9dv21W.ttf

5aUt9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt7V9dv21W.ttf

85 ms

5aUo9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt7V9VFE9GiU9D.ttf

5aUo9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt7V9VFE9GiU9D.ttf

101 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

390 ms

Accessibility Review

ashmoreconsulting.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ashmoreconsulting.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ashmoreconsulting.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ashmoreconsulting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ashmoreconsulting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ashmoreconsulting.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ashmoreconsulting. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: