Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 39% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

axeapollo.com

Test Page for the Nginx HTTP Server on the Amazon Linux AMI

Page Load Speed

7.4 sec in total

First Response

234 ms

Resources Loaded

5.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.7 sec

axeapollo.com screenshot

About Website

Visit axeapollo.com now to see the best up-to-date Axeapollo content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about axeapollo.com

Experience LYNX's universe of antiperspirants and deodorants, the best men's hair products and a men's skin care line to make the right first impression.

Visit axeapollo.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Axeapollo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 234 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

axeapollo.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,580 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.lynxeffect.com

234 ms

www.lynxmalegrooming.co.uk

876 ms

style.css

29 ms

modernizr.js

11 ms

RR_widget.js

41 ms

Our browser made a total of 136 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Axeapollo.com, 6% (8 requests) were made to Cookieq.com and 5% (7 requests) were made to Eu.kritique.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (876 ms) relates to the external source Lynxmalegrooming.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 6.3 MB (42%)

Content Size

15.1 MB

After Optimization

8.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Axeapollo.com main page is 15.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 13.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 96.1 kB

  • Original 108.2 kB
  • After minification 84.3 kB
  • After compression 12.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.9 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.1 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 5.3 MB

  • Original 13.6 MB
  • After minification 8.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Axeapollo needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.3 MB or 39% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 723.8 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 432.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 723.8 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 171.0 kB

  • Original 201.9 kB
  • After minification 198.2 kB
  • After compression 30.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Axeapollo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 171.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (24%)

Requests Now

130

After Optimization

99

The browser has sent 130 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Axeapollo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

axeapollo.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

axeapollo.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Requests the geolocation permission on page load

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

axeapollo.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Axeapollo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Axeapollo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Axeapollo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: