Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

6harf.com

Web Tasarım, Yazılım ve E-ticaret Hizmetleri - 6Harf Dijital Hizmetler

Page Load Speed

6.8 sec in total

First Response

498 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

2.7 sec

About Website

Click here to check amazing 6Harf content for Turkey. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 6harf.com

Kullanıcı odaklı web tasarım, yazılım ve danışmanlık hizmetleriyle, dijital performansınızı arttırıyor ve dijital varlıklarınızı modern dünyaya uyarlıyoruz.

Visit 6harf.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 6harf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 498 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

6harf.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value520 ms

56/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.9 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

6harf.com

498 ms

6harf.com

943 ms

app.min.css

308 ms

gtag.js

788 ms

app.min.js

961 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original 6harf.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Google.com.tr. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain 6harf.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 170.4 kB (28%)

Content Size

618.6 kB

After Optimization

448.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of 6harf.com main page is 618.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 510.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 94.2 kB

  • Original 108.5 kB
  • After minification 65.6 kB
  • After compression 14.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 42.8 kB, which is 39% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 76.2 kB

  • Original 510.1 kB
  • After minification 433.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, 6Harf needs image optimization as it can save up to 76.2 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (17%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

19

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 6Harf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

6harf.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

6harf.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

6harf.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    TR

  • Language Claimed

    TR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 6harf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Turkish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 6harf.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 6Harf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: