Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

andersonprocess.com

Anderson Process | Supplier of Industrial and Sanitary Pumps, Hoses, Filtration, Heat Exchangers, Mixers, Process Equipment and Custom Skids

Page Load Speed

5.8 sec in total

First Response

132 ms

Resources Loaded

4.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

About Website

Visit andersonprocess.com now to see the best up-to-date Anderson Process content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about andersonprocess.com

Our extensive catalog includes leading industrial pumps, NAHAD-certified hose assemblies, state-of-the-art filter technologies and an expansive set of supporting equipment.

Visit andersonprocess.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Andersonprocess.com page load time and found that the first response time was 132 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

andersonprocess.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.1 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value670 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.054

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.3 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

andersonprocess.com

132 ms

www.andersonprocess.com

1928 ms

css

44 ms

animate.min.css

51 ms

foundation.min.css

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 144 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (121 requests) were addressed to the original Andersonprocess.com, 5% (7 requests) were made to S3.amazonaws.com and 3% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Andersonprocess.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 412.0 kB (9%)

Content Size

4.8 MB

After Optimization

4.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Andersonprocess.com main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 205.8 kB

  • Original 232.8 kB
  • After minification 160.0 kB
  • After compression 26.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 72.8 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 205.8 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 103.3 kB

  • Original 3.9 MB
  • After minification 3.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Anderson Process images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 98.6 kB

  • Original 618.8 kB
  • After minification 618.8 kB
  • After compression 520.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 98.6 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 78.5 kB
  • After minification 78.5 kB
  • After compression 74.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Andersonprocess.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (39%)

Requests Now

137

After Optimization

83

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 137 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Anderson Process. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

andersonprocess.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

andersonprocess.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

andersonprocess.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Andersonprocess.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Andersonprocess.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Anderson Process. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: