Access azhogwild.com. Azhogwild.com : Informasi Tips Berbagai Aplikasi Lengkap

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

61/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

70/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.071

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

azhogwild.com

802 ms

style.min.css

29 ms

style.css

33 ms

css

33 ms

boxicons.css

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Azhogwild.com, 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Azhogwild.com.

Content Size

719.3 kB

After Optimization

608.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Azhogwild.com main page is 719.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 461.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 70.3 kB

Original 83.3 kB
After minification 72.3 kB
After compression 13.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.1 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 8.9 kB

Original 461.1 kB
After minification 452.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Azhogwild images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 12.4 kB

Original 83.7 kB
After minification 83.7 kB
After compression 71.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.4 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 19.1 kB

Original 91.1 kB
After minification 91.1 kB
After compression 72.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Azhogwild.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.1 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Azhogwild. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.