Access bathselfcatering.net. Tucking Mill | Tucking Mill Luxury Holiday Accommodation

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value26.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.0 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,600 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.292

41/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.1 s

0/100

10%

www.tuckingmill.com

715 ms

css2

68 ms

style.min.css

150 ms

blocks.style.build.css

237 ms

style.css

238 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Bathselfcatering.net, 11% (5 requests) were made to D2j7zyalzn2344.cloudfront.net and 11% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (715 ms) relates to the external source Tuckingmill.com.

Content Size

4.7 MB

After Optimization

4.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Bathselfcatering.net main page is 4.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 131.9 kB

Original 153.2 kB
After minification 149.7 kB
After compression 21.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 131.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 88.2 kB

Original 3.6 MB
After minification 3.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Bathselfcatering images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 171.5 kB

Original 845.8 kB
After minification 845.8 kB
After compression 674.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 171.5 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

Original 102.4 kB
After minification 102.4 kB
After compression 92.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bathselfcatering.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bathselfcatering. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.