Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

bettercallarmstrong.com

Home - Better Call Armstrong

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

165 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

448 ms

About Website

Welcome to bettercallarmstrong.com homepage info - get ready to check Better Call Armstrong best content right away, or after learning these important things about bettercallarmstrong.com

Better Call Armstrong Something Wrong? Better Call Armstrong! Name(Required) First Last Phone(Required)Email(Required) Preferred

Visit bettercallarmstrong.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bettercallarmstrong.com page load time and found that the first response time was 165 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bettercallarmstrong.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,190 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.257

48/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.8 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bettercallarmstrong.com

165 ms

bettercallarmstrong.com

474 ms

ArmstrongAnniversaryLogo_withLogo-300x224.png

116 ms

MrArmstrongHeaderNew.gif

163 ms

lazyload.min.js

152 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Bettercallarmstrong.com, 13% (3 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (474 ms) belongs to the original domain Bettercallarmstrong.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 360.6 kB (35%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

668.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Bettercallarmstrong.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 608.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 355.1 kB

  • Original 420.3 kB
  • After minification 410.9 kB
  • After compression 65.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 355.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

  • Original 608.9 kB
  • After minification 603.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Better Call Armstrong images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

19

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Better Call Armstrong. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

bettercallarmstrong.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

bettercallarmstrong.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

bettercallarmstrong.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bettercallarmstrong.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Bettercallarmstrong.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Better Call Armstrong. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: