Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

charlottefoot.com

Charlotte Podiatrist | Charlotte Foot Doctor | Fort Mill, SC Diabetic Foot Care

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

45 ms

Resources Loaded

961 ms

Page Rendered

424 ms

About Website

Welcome to charlottefoot.com homepage info - get ready to check Charlotte Foot best content right away, or after learning these important things about charlottefoot.com

Charlotte Podiatrist provides treatments for Diabetic Foot Care, Foot Pain, Ingrown Toenails, Heel Pain, Bunions, Nail Fungus serving Charlotte, 28273, Fort Mill, SC, Gastonia, NC, Pineville, NC,

Visit charlottefoot.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Charlottefoot.com page load time and found that the first response time was 45 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

charlottefoot.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.1 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

charlottefoot.com

45 ms

charlottefoot.com

238 ms

www.charlottefoot.com

65 ms

www.charlottefoot.com

223 ms

20b796a45b1f8d0703f59fa9f92b5817.opt-min.cr.css

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Charlottefoot.com, 45% (9 requests) were made to Cdcssl.ibsrv.net and 5% (1 request) were made to My.onlinepodiatrysites.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (320 ms) relates to the external source My.onlinepodiatrysites.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 109.3 kB (38%)

Content Size

285.7 kB

After Optimization

176.4 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Charlottefoot.com main page is 285.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 189.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 50.2 kB

  • Original 64.4 kB
  • After minification 63.8 kB
  • After compression 14.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 58.3 kB

  • Original 189.8 kB
  • After minification 189.8 kB
  • After compression 131.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 58.3 kB or 31% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 874 B

  • Original 31.5 kB
  • After minification 31.5 kB
  • After compression 30.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Charlottefoot.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (25%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Charlotte Foot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

charlottefoot.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

charlottefoot.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

charlottefoot.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Charlottefoot.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Charlottefoot.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Charlotte Foot. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: