Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

eaglemarineservices.com

Fenix Marine Services - Accelerating Your Shipments

Page Load Speed

6.5 sec in total

First Response

51 ms

Resources Loaded

6 sec

Page Rendered

462 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Eagle Marine Services content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eaglemarineservices.com

We believe that attitude determines altitude, and we bring a positive, results-oriented approach to every shipment. Count on it. Count on us.

Visit eaglemarineservices.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Eaglemarineservices.com page load time and found that the first response time was 51 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eaglemarineservices.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value21.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value38.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,640 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value38.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eaglemarineservices.com

51 ms

fenixmarineservices.com

720 ms

styles.css

25 ms

jquery.dataTables.min.css

154 ms

buttons.dataTables.min.css

161 ms

Our browser made a total of 177 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Eaglemarineservices.com, 68% (121 requests) were made to Fenixmarineservices.com and 12% (22 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) relates to the external source Fenixmarineservices.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.0 MB (58%)

Content Size

5.1 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Eaglemarineservices.com main page is 5.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 59.2 kB

  • Original 74.5 kB
  • After minification 73.0 kB
  • After compression 15.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 32.2 kB

  • Original 663.0 kB
  • After minification 630.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eagle Marine Services images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB
  • After compression 893.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 1.6 MB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB
  • After compression 616.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eaglemarineservices.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 151 (87%)

Requests Now

173

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 173 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eagle Marine Services. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 115 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 38 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

eaglemarineservices.com accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

eaglemarineservices.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

eaglemarineservices.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eaglemarineservices.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eaglemarineservices.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Eagle Marine Services. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: