Access egaceutical.com. Age Reversal | Human Aging Reversal

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value12.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value37.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,600 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.2 s

0/100

10%

egaceutical.com

149 ms

www.egaceutical.com

2732 ms

css

32 ms

grid.css

128 ms

base.css

185 ms

Our browser made a total of 147 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (125 requests) were addressed to the original Egaceutical.com, 5% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 4% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Egaceutical.com.

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

831.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Egaceutical.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 487.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 62.5 kB

Original 77.1 kB
After minification 75.5 kB
After compression 14.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 827 B

Original 265.0 kB
After minification 264.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Egaceutical images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 125.5 kB

Original 487.2 kB
After minification 483.6 kB
After compression 361.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 125.5 kB or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 91.9 kB

Original 282.5 kB
After minification 281.4 kB
After compression 190.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Egaceutical.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 91.9 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Now

134

After Optimization

The browser has sent 134 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Egaceutical. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 58 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 70 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.