Access epox.in. What is Epoxy Paint? Latest Epoxy price, Disinfectant, Floor cleaner, hand sanitizer, Floor sanitize...

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value26.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.1 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.306

38/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

36/100

10%

epox.in

837 ms

settings4f3c.css

382 ms

dynamic-captions4f3c.css

384 ms

static-captions4f3c.css

383 ms

css

18 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (84 requests) were addressed to the original Epox.in, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Epox.in.

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Epox.in main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 56.7 kB

Original 69.1 kB
After minification 64.6 kB
After compression 12.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 77.6 kB

Original 2.5 MB
After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Epox images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 11.8 kB

Original 138.6 kB
After minification 138.6 kB
After compression 126.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

Original 74.1 kB
After minification 74.1 kB
After compression 63.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Epox.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Epox. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.