Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

farmingbysatellite.eu

Farming by satellite || Farming by Satellite

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

69 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

322 ms

About Website

Welcome to farmingbysatellite.eu homepage info - get ready to check Farming By Satellite best content right away, or after learning these important things about farmingbysatellite.eu

Share your ideas for using satellite technologies to improve agricultural production, efficiency, profit and environmental impact.

Visit farmingbysatellite.eu

Key Findings

We analyzed Farmingbysatellite.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 69 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

farmingbysatellite.eu performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,160 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.086

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.7 s

56/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

farmingbysatellite.eu

69 ms

www.farmingbysatellite.eu

1094 ms

js

79 ms

whatsapp-gbogroup.webp

2408 ms

bola-gbo.webp

103 ms

Our browser made a total of 187 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Farmingbysatellite.eu, 86% (160 requests) were made to Files.sitestatic.net and 5% (9 requests) were made to Cdn.sitestatic.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) relates to the external source Gbo-assets.sgp1.digitaloceanspaces.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 327.0 kB (14%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Farmingbysatellite.eu main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 320.8 kB

  • Original 348.3 kB
  • After minification 206.4 kB
  • After compression 27.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 141.9 kB, which is 41% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 320.8 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Farming By Satellite images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 170 B

  • Original 144.7 kB
  • After minification 144.7 kB
  • After compression 144.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 14.6 kB
  • After minification 12.6 kB
  • After compression 12.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Farmingbysatellite.eu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.1 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (11%)

Requests Now

184

After Optimization

163

The browser has sent 184 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Farming By Satellite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

farmingbysatellite.eu accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

farmingbysatellite.eu best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

farmingbysatellite.eu SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    ID

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Farmingbysatellite.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Farmingbysatellite.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Farming By Satellite. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: