Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

fihoca.com

FIHOCA - Consultoría tecnológica, software factory y outsourcing IT

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

333 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

About Website

Visit fihoca.com now to see the best up-to-date FIHOCA content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fihoca.com

Consultorías tecnológica especialista en Tecnologías de la Información (TI) para medianas y grandes corporaciones. Estrategia y ejecución.

Visit fihoca.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fihoca.com page load time and found that the first response time was 333 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fihoca.com performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

85/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

72/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.21

59/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.4 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fihoca.com

333 ms

www.fihoca.com

946 ms

css

38 ms

search.svg

213 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

64 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Fihoca.com, 23% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (946 ms) belongs to the original domain Fihoca.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 296.8 kB (26%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

839.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Fihoca.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 871.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 215.8 kB

  • Original 264.9 kB
  • After minification 257.9 kB
  • After compression 49.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 215.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 81.0 kB

  • Original 871.3 kB
  • After minification 790.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. FIHOCA images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

17

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of FIHOCA. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

fihoca.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

fihoca.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

fihoca.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fihoca.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fihoca.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of FIHOCA. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: