Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

gfaclaims.com

GFAclaims.com - деловое издание, ежедневные новости!

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

402 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

891 ms

About Website

Visit gfaclaims.com now to see the best up-to-date GFAclaims content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gfaclaims.com

«GFAclaims.com» можно причислить к новостным ресурсам, на которых размещается актуальная информация о России, и всему миру в целом. Мы публикуем только достоверные факты из проверенных источников, меж...

Visit gfaclaims.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gfaclaims.com page load time and found that the first response time was 402 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gfaclaims.com performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

20/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value370 ms

71/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.105

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gfaclaims.com

402 ms

index.php

335 ms

index.php

432 ms

engine.css

27 ms

styles.css

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Gfaclaims.com, 42% (10 requests) were made to Icdn.lenta.ru and 8% (2 requests) were made to Counter.yadro.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) relates to the external source Icdn.lenta.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 80.4 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

956.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Gfaclaims.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 831.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 80.4 kB

  • Original 103.1 kB
  • After minification 103.1 kB
  • After compression 22.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 831.3 kB
  • After minification 831.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GFAclaims images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 66 B

  • Original 70.0 kB
  • After minification 70.0 kB
  • After compression 69.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 32.7 kB
  • After minification 32.7 kB
  • After compression 32.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gfaclaims.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (20%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

16

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GFAclaims. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

gfaclaims.com accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gfaclaims.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gfaclaims.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gfaclaims.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gfaclaims.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of GFAclaims. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: