Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

gillespieshields.com

Law Firm in Phoenix & Mesa Arizona | Experienced Family Lawyers

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

130 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

751 ms

About Website

Visit gillespieshields.com now to see the best up-to-date Gillespieshields content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gillespieshields.com

Founded in 1985, Gillespie, Shields & Taylor is an experienced law firm in AZ with locations in Phoenix & Mesa. Let us put our years of experience to work for you.

Visit gillespieshields.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gillespieshields.com page load time and found that the first response time was 130 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gillespieshields.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.1 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,180 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.212

59/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.5 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gillespieshields.com

130 ms

gillespieshields.com

264 ms

javascript;base64,CgkJZG9jdW1lbnQuZG9jdW1lbnRFbGVtZW50LmNsYXNzTmFtZSA9ICdqcyc7Cgk=

19 ms

style.min.css

54 ms

autoptimize_single_73d29ecb3ae4eb2b78712fab3a46d32d.php

232 ms

Our browser made a total of 145 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Gillespieshields.com, 19% (28 requests) were made to and 7% (10 requests) were made to Lh3.googleusercontent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 204.5 kB (19%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

861.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Gillespieshields.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 494.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 185.9 kB

  • Original 239.6 kB
  • After minification 239.3 kB
  • After compression 53.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 185.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 10.1 kB

  • Original 210.3 kB
  • After minification 200.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gillespieshields images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 494.1 kB
  • After minification 494.1 kB
  • After compression 490.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 122.2 kB
  • After minification 122.2 kB
  • After compression 117.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gillespieshields.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 74 (78%)

Requests Now

95

After Optimization

21

The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gillespieshields. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 52 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

gillespieshields.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gillespieshields.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gillespieshields.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gillespieshields.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gillespieshields.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gillespieshields. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: