Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

groundbreak.com

Groundbreak 2024 - Join us this year. | Procore

Page Load Speed

328 ms in total

First Response

62 ms

Resources Loaded

216 ms

Page Rendered

50 ms

About Website

Welcome to groundbreak.com homepage info - get ready to check Groundbreak best content right away, or after learning these important things about groundbreak.com

Join us in Denver for the global construction innovation event of the year.

Visit groundbreak.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Groundbreak.com page load time and found that the first response time was 62 ms and then it took 266 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

groundbreak.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.3 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,640 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.333

34/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

62 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Groundbreak.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (62 ms) relates to the external source Procore.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 27.0 kB (28%)

Content Size

96.9 kB

After Optimization

69.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Groundbreak.com main page is 96.9 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 89.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 46 B

  • Original 187 B
  • After minification 160 B
  • After compression 141 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27 B, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46 B or 25% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 26.0 kB

  • Original 89.9 kB
  • After minification 63.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Groundbreak needs image optimization as it can save up to 26.0 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 971 B

  • Original 6.8 kB
  • After minification 6.8 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 971 B or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

groundbreak.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

groundbreak.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

groundbreak.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Groundbreak.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Groundbreak.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Groundbreak. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: