Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

guidekick.co

Facilities Management Services & Automation Platform | ServiceChannel

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

16 ms

Resources Loaded

686 ms

Page Rendered

879 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Guidekick content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about guidekick.co

The leader in facilities management software and contractor sourcing, ServiceChannel lets you manage all maintenance activity from a single platform. Learn more.

Visit guidekick.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Guidekick.co page load time and found that the first response time was 16 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

guidekick.co performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

60/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.6 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,230 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.434

22/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

guidekick.co

16 ms

servicechannel.com

25 ms

style.min.css

7 ms

main-HQou36u9.css

23 ms

b22551c5c778d0bf.js

80 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Guidekick.co, 84% (62 requests) were made to Servicechannel.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fast.wistia.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (291 ms) relates to the external source Servicechannel.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 386.3 kB (11%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Guidekick.co main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 79.9 kB

  • Original 97.4 kB
  • After minification 97.2 kB
  • After compression 17.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 306.3 kB

  • Original 2.9 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Guidekick images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 86 B

  • Original 457.8 kB
  • After minification 457.8 kB
  • After compression 457.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 45 B

  • Original 71.4 kB
  • After minification 71.4 kB
  • After compression 71.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Guidekick.co has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (19%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

52

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Guidekick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

guidekick.co accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

guidekick.co best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

guidekick.co SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Guidekick.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Guidekick.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Guidekick. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: