Access hankel.ru. Бытовая техника

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value460 ms

62/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.045

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.6 s

47/100

10%

hankel.ru

395 ms

hankel.ru

265 ms

e88c6ba1a747e3bb606be66ce25001fe.css

544 ms

css

31 ms

jquery.min-3.5.1.js

231 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Hankel.ru, 9% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Yandex.ru.

Content Size

187.6 kB

After Optimization

133.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Hankel.ru main page is 187.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 85.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 53.4 kB

Original 64.9 kB
After minification 64.7 kB
After compression 11.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 440 B

Original 4.9 kB
After minification 4.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hankel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 85.3 kB
After minification 85.3 kB
After compression 85.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 69 B

Original 32.4 kB
After minification 32.4 kB
After compression 32.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hankel.ru has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hankel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.