Tools & Wizards About Us
j-lyric.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

j-lyric.net

歌詞検索J-Lyric.net

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

531 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

218 ms

j-lyric.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to j-lyric.net homepage info - get ready to check J Lyric best content for Japan right away, or after learning these important things about j-lyric.net

歌詞検索J-Lyric.netは、無料で歌詞の検索・閲覧ができる歌詞検索サイトです。JPOP、演歌、歌謡曲、アニメ主題歌、ドラマ主題歌、映画主題歌などを簡単な操作で検索することができます。

Visit j-lyric.net

Key Findings

We analyzed J-lyric.net page load time and found that the first response time was 531 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

j-lyric.net performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

81/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

96/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,060 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.46

19/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.5 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

j-lyric.net

531 ms

j-lyric.net

720 ms

js

60 ms

back2.png

192 ms

2427428_s.jpg

357 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original J-lyric.net, 18% (17 requests) were made to Images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com and 15% (14 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (720 ms) belongs to the original domain J-lyric.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 65.6 kB (10%)

Content Size

677.8 kB

After Optimization

612.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of J-lyric.net main page is 677.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 526.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 48.2 kB

  • Original 62.1 kB
  • After minification 62.0 kB
  • After compression 13.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 89.4 kB
  • After minification 87.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. J Lyric images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 15.3 kB

  • Original 526.3 kB
  • After minification 526.3 kB
  • After compression 511.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (43%)

Requests Now

86

After Optimization

49

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of J Lyric. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

j-lyric.net

j-lyric.net

531 ms

j-lyric.net

j-lyric.net

720 ms

js

js

60 ms

back2.png

back2.png

192 ms

2427428_s.jpg

2427428_s.jpg

357 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

191 ms

B0CXDD1RNP.09.THUMBZZZ

B0CXDD1RNP.09.THUMBZZZ

96 ms

1063489_s.jpg

1063489_s.jpg

547 ms

22458199_s.jpg

22458199_s.jpg

548 ms

fuyunodoyo_s.jpg

fuyunodoyo_s.jpg

549 ms

sotsuenshiki_s.jpg

sotsuenshiki_s.jpg

550 ms

sotsugyo_s.jpg

sotsugyo_s.jpg

550 ms

back1.png

back1.png

550 ms

jasrac.png

jasrac.png

658 ms

NexTone.png

NexTone.png

673 ms

B0CY4FKRC8.09.THUMBZZZ

B0CY4FKRC8.09.THUMBZZZ

185 ms

B0CVS4LHVM.09.THUMBZZZ

B0CVS4LHVM.09.THUMBZZZ

185 ms

B0CXDD1RNP.09.TZZZZZZZ

B0CXDD1RNP.09.TZZZZZZZ

185 ms

B0CWLKVR97.09.TZZZZZZZ

B0CWLKVR97.09.TZZZZZZZ

183 ms

B0CYZKT1HD.09.TZZZZZZZ

B0CYZKT1HD.09.TZZZZZZZ

254 ms

B0CXPLHQB4.09.TZZZZZZZ

B0CXPLHQB4.09.TZZZZZZZ

273 ms

B0CVF5TQTW.09.TZZZZZZZ

B0CVF5TQTW.09.TZZZZZZZ

253 ms

B0CSPCVT36.09.TZZZZZZZ

B0CSPCVT36.09.TZZZZZZZ

256 ms

B0CVB32JCW.09.THUMBZZZ

B0CVB32JCW.09.THUMBZZZ

289 ms

B002AAC90C.09.THUMBZZZ

B002AAC90C.09.THUMBZZZ

257 ms

B00C96W1D2.09.THUMBZZZ

B00C96W1D2.09.THUMBZZZ

281 ms

B01GJXSQBG.09.THUMBZZZ

B01GJXSQBG.09.THUMBZZZ

275 ms

B001HK0E94.09.THUMBZZZ

B001HK0E94.09.THUMBZZZ

320 ms

B000R28L7A.09.THUMBZZZ

B000R28L7A.09.THUMBZZZ

274 ms

B00005FN11.09.THUMBZZZ

B00005FN11.09.THUMBZZZ

342 ms

B000GIXUEO.09.THUMBZZZ

B000GIXUEO.09.THUMBZZZ

331 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

18 ms

collect

collect

74 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

247 ms

collect

collect

49 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

38 ms

ads

ads

156 ms

ads

ads

331 ms

ads

ads

368 ms

ads

ads

156 ms

ads

ads

148 ms

ca-pub-4888448476575673

ca-pub-4888448476575673

85 ms

ads

ads

140 ms

ads

ads

125 ms

ads

ads

364 ms

gen_204

gen_204

59 ms

pixel

pixel

69 ms

dv3.js

dv3.js

100 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

18 ms

qs_click_protection.js

qs_click_protection.js

22 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

168 ms

pixel

pixel

66 ms

pixel

pixel

78 ms

ad

ad

43 ms

rum

rum

164 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

158 ms

Q12zgMmT.js

Q12zgMmT.js

152 ms

icon.png

icon.png

175 ms

bounce

bounce

85 ms

pixel

pixel

65 ms

97 ms

62bHydCX.html

62bHydCX.html

46 ms

pixel

pixel

411 ms

ad

ad

44 ms

gen_204

gen_204

194 ms

rum

rum

25 ms

pixel

pixel

141 ms

FAz5UgRug7M8YaGFfFWxr9vetrg5Yv9xXEx-zc6kZAs.js

FAz5UgRug7M8YaGFfFWxr9vetrg5Yv9xXEx-zc6kZAs.js

26 ms

cookie_push_onload.html

cookie_push_onload.html

134 ms

116 ms

activeview

activeview

90 ms

activeview

activeview

90 ms

asr

asr

711 ms

ftUtils.js

ftUtils.js

147 ms

28 ms

pixel

pixel

25 ms

pixel

pixel

85 ms

pixel

pixel

53 ms

pixel

pixel

28 ms

pixel

pixel

29 ms

4639226.json

4639226.json

72 ms

4639229.json

4639229.json

67 ms

pixel

pixel

42 ms

rum

rum

44 ms

setuid

setuid

43 ms

rum

rum

46 ms

sodar

sodar

88 ms

pixel

pixel

18 ms

sodar2.js

sodar2.js

6 ms

runner.html

runner.html

8 ms

aframe

aframe

24 ms

feg8rL66UTsTrrlS9w_iUH8JqR_kCfLFdi2W6wljJCU.js

feg8rL66UTsTrrlS9w_iUH8JqR_kCfLFdi2W6wljJCU.js

4 ms

pixel

pixel

18 ms

pixel

pixel

14 ms

Accessibility Review

j-lyric.net accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

j-lyric.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

j-lyric.net SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise J-lyric.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that J-lyric.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

j-lyric.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of J Lyric. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: