Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

interbanner.com

DISEÑO WEB MADRID | Diseño y desarrollo de Páginas Web en Madrid DISEÑO WEB MADRID

Page Load Speed

8.5 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

5.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

About Website

Visit interbanner.com now to see the best up-to-date Interbanner content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about interbanner.com

Diseño web Madrid. Desarrollo web y posicionamiento SEO. Diseño y creación de páginas web en Madrid. Diseño web profesional en Madrid. ☎ (+34) 91 638 19 59.

Visit interbanner.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Interbanner.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

interbanner.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.0 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,270 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.132

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.6 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.interbanner.com

1272 ms

js

72 ms

css

39 ms

css

55 ms

css

66 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Interbanner.com, 27% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Interbanner.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (48%)

Content Size

3.3 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Interbanner.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 1.6 MB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB
  • After compression 252.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 971.4 kB
  • After minification 965.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interbanner images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 495.7 kB
  • After minification 495.7 kB
  • After compression 494.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (46%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interbanner. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

interbanner.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

interbanner.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

interbanner.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interbanner.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interbanner.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Interbanner. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: