Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

interssh.com

Interssh.com

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

46 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

227 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Interssh content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about interssh.com

Visit interssh.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Interssh.com page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

interssh.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

32/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value31.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value72,100 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.409

24/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value92.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

interssh.com

46 ms

interssh.com

694 ms

bootstrap.min.css

23 ms

flat-ui.min.css

52 ms

main.css

43 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Interssh.com, 17% (10 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com and 14% (8 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (694 ms) belongs to the original domain Interssh.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 34.6 kB (22%)

Content Size

157.5 kB

After Optimization

122.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Interssh.com main page is 157.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 145.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by -8 B

  • Original 0 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This web page is already compressed.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 571 B

  • Original 6.3 kB
  • After minification 5.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interssh images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 34.1 kB

  • Original 145.1 kB
  • After minification 145.0 kB
  • After compression 111.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.1 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 14 B

  • Original 6.1 kB
  • After minification 6.1 kB
  • After compression 6.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interssh.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (66%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

16

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interssh. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

interssh.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

interssh.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

interssh.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interssh.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Interssh.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Interssh. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: