Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 6

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

jessops.com

Jessops | Digital Cameras | Lenses | Drones & Video

Page Load Speed

5.9 sec in total

First Response

72 ms

Resources Loaded

5.2 sec

Page Rendered

640 ms

About Website

Visit jessops.com now to see the best up-to-date Jessops content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jessops.com

Explore our cameras, lenses, accessories, & more at Jessops. With leading brands like Canon, Sony, & Nikon, order online or visit our stores across the UK.

Visit jessops.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jessops.com page load time and found that the first response time was 72 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jessops.com performance score

6

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,780 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.795

5/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jessops.com

72 ms

www.jessops.com

615 ms

css

54 ms

style.css

26 ms

j-style.css

365 ms

Our browser made a total of 171 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 16% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Jessops.com, 39% (66 requests) were made to I.jessops.com and 28% (48 requests) were made to Images2.jessops.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) relates to the external source Images2.jessops.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 279.8 kB (7%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

3.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jessops.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 123.4 kB

  • Original 158.3 kB
  • After minification 158.0 kB
  • After compression 34.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 123.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 153.0 kB

  • Original 3.4 MB
  • After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jessops images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 232.9 kB
  • After minification 232.9 kB
  • After compression 229.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 42 B

  • Original 42.1 kB
  • After minification 42.1 kB
  • After compression 42.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jessops.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (33%)

Requests Now

168

After Optimization

112

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 168 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jessops. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

jessops.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

jessops.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

jessops.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jessops.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jessops.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jessops. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: