26.5 sec in total
929 ms
24 sec
1.5 sec
Visit jff.name now to see the best up-to-date Jff content for Ukraine and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jff.name
Блог фрилансера про работу на иностранных биржах (Upwork, oDesk и Elance).
Visit jff.nameWe analyzed Jff.name page load time and found that the first response time was 929 ms and then it took 25.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
jff.name performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value3.0 s
77/100
25%
Value5.5 s
55/100
10%
Value2,960 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value7.3 s
50/100
10%
929 ms
296 ms
293 ms
291 ms
307 ms
Our browser made a total of 134 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Jff.name, 10% (13 requests) were made to O.twimg.com and 9% (12 requests) were made to S.podster.fm. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) relates to the external source Vk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (30%)
3.5 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Jff.name main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 309.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jff needs image optimization as it can save up to 309.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 505.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 505.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 149.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jff.name needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 149.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 73 (60%)
121
48
The browser has sent 121 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
jff.name accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
jff.name best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
jff.name SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jff.name can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jff.name main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
{{og_description}}
jff.name
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jff. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: