Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

jmroofsiding.com

Roofing Norwalk CT | Roof Repair | Roofer Fairfield County

Page Load Speed

360 ms in total

First Response

43 ms

Resources Loaded

317 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Jm Roof Siding content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jmroofsiding.com

From roof installations & replacements, to siding repair & installation, you can count on JM Roofing & Siding for exceptional service. Call 203-299-0716!

Visit jmroofsiding.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jmroofsiding.com page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 317 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jmroofsiding.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,080 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jmroofsiding.com

43 ms

jmroofsiding.com

78 ms

css

34 ms

style.min.css

25 ms

front_end.css

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Jmroofsiding.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Unpkg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (158 ms) belongs to the original domain Jmroofsiding.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 195.6 kB (63%)

Content Size

310.7 kB

After Optimization

115.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Jmroofsiding.com main page is 310.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 235.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 192.7 kB

  • Original 235.3 kB
  • After minification 234.6 kB
  • After compression 42.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 192.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 75.5 kB
  • After minification 75.5 kB
  • After compression 72.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jmroofsiding.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (93%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jm Roof Siding. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

jmroofsiding.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

jmroofsiding.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

jmroofsiding.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jmroofsiding.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jmroofsiding.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jm Roof Siding. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: