Report Summary

  • 3

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

johnstonandmurphy.com

Johnston & Murphy

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

80 ms

Resources Loaded

821 ms

Page Rendered

431 ms

About Website

Welcome to johnstonandmurphy.com homepage info - get ready to check Johnston And Murphy best content right away, or after learning these important things about johnstonandmurphy.com

Shop Johnston & Murphy for a premium selection of men's and women's shoes, apparel and accessories. Free shipping and free 365-day returns for J&M Insiders.

Visit johnstonandmurphy.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Johnstonandmurphy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 80 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

johnstonandmurphy.com performance score

3

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value28.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,660 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.792

5/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value47.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

johnstonandmurphy.com

80 ms

Default-Start

201 ms

widget.js

81 ms

main.js

42 ms

vcn.js

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Johnstonandmurphy.com, 75% (55 requests) were made to Johnstonmurphy.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Consent.trustarc.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (201 ms) relates to the external source Johnstonmurphy.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 627 B (0%)

Content Size

530.3 kB

After Optimization

529.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Johnstonandmurphy.com main page is 530.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 325.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by -8 B

  • Original 0 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This web page is already compressed.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 205.3 kB
  • After minification 205.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Johnston And Murphy images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 635 B

  • Original 325.0 kB
  • After minification 325.0 kB
  • After compression 324.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (60%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Johnston And Murphy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

johnstonandmurphy.com accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[role]s do not have all required [aria-*] attributes

High

[aria-*] attributes are not valid or misspelled

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

johnstonandmurphy.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

johnstonandmurphy.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Johnstonandmurphy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Johnstonandmurphy.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Johnston And Murphy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: