Access ww7.joomexp.com. WordPress vs. Joomla: which is better?

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

71/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value870 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.106

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.1 s

33/100

10%

ww7.joomexp.com

61 ms

383 ms

gtm.js

82 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

365 ms

style.min.css

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ww7.joomexp.com, 57% (45 requests) were made to Easywp.com and 10% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Easywp.com.

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Ww7.joomexp.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 780.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 53.9 kB

Original 71.5 kB
After minification 69.3 kB
After compression 17.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 117.5 kB

Original 780.8 kB
After minification 663.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ww 7 Joomexp needs image optimization as it can save up to 117.5 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 35.6 kB

Original 379.5 kB
After minification 379.5 kB
After compression 343.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 90 B

Original 81.6 kB
After minification 81.6 kB
After compression 81.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ww7.joomexp.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ww 7 Joomexp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.