Access lovingrest.com. LovingRest Pet Funeral Home | Pet Cremation

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

91/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,220 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.051

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.6 s

3/100

10%

lovingrest.com

124 ms

www.lovingrest.com

87 ms

hic.js

22 ms

Logo-451w.jpg

114 ms

amelie-gallery-01.jpg

104 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 16% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Lovingrest.com, 42% (13 requests) were made to Le-cdn.hibuwebsites.com and 13% (4 requests) were made to Static-res-cdn.websites.hibu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (970 ms) relates to the external source Le-cdn.hibuwebsites.com.

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

555.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Lovingrest.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 107.0 kB

Original 140.1 kB
After minification 135.9 kB
After compression 33.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

Original 1.5 MB
After minification 351.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Loving Rest needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 77% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 55.7 kB

Original 226.2 kB
After minification 218.6 kB
After compression 170.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 55.7 kB or 25% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 36 B

Original 125 B
After minification 125 B
After compression 89 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lovingrest.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36 B or 29% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Loving Rest. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.