Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

clinical-communication.mdtechreview.com

Technology Magazine for Physicians | Md Tech Review

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

132 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

416 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Clinical Communication Md Tech Review content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about clinical-communication.mdtechreview.com

MD Tech Review provides a curated knowledge network for physicians, technology professionals in hospitals and other healthcare facilities. A trustworthy platform where HealthTech insiders can share th...

Visit clinical-communication.mdtechreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Clinical-communication.mdtechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 132 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

clinical-communication.mdtechreview.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value900 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.364

29/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.9 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

clinical-communication.mdtechreview.com

132 ms

www.mdtechreview.com

367 ms

bootstrap.min.css

131 ms

core.css

178 ms

shortcodes.css

181 ms

Our browser made a total of 116 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Clinical-communication.mdtechreview.com, 70% (81 requests) were made to Mdtechreview.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (612 ms) relates to the external source Mdtechreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 340.1 kB (19%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Clinical-communication.mdtechreview.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 742.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 128.1 kB

  • Original 150.4 kB
  • After minification 102.1 kB
  • After compression 22.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 48.3 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 18.8 kB

  • Original 742.4 kB
  • After minification 723.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Clinical Communication Md Tech Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 123.2 kB

  • Original 716.6 kB
  • After minification 713.9 kB
  • After compression 593.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 123.2 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 70.1 kB

  • Original 141.6 kB
  • After minification 138.7 kB
  • After compression 71.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Clinical-communication.mdtechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 70.1 kB or 49% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (53%)

Requests Now

95

After Optimization

45

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Clinical Communication Md Tech Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

clinical-communication.mdtechreview.com accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

clinical-communication.mdtechreview.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

clinical-communication.mdtechreview.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Clinical-communication.mdtechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Clinical-communication.mdtechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Clinical Communication Md Tech Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: