Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

microform.digital

Document Management & Digitisation Services | Microform

Page Load Speed

6.8 sec in total

First Response

192 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

2.3 sec

About Website

Welcome to microform.digital homepage info - get ready to check Microform best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about microform.digital

With over 60 years' experience, Microform is an industry leader document scanning & management in the UK.

Visit microform.digital

Key Findings

We analyzed Microform.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 192 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

microform.digital performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

56/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value700 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

microform.digital

192 ms

microform.digital

546 ms

documents.svg

37 ms

large-format.svg

16 ms

microfiche.svg

17 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Microform.digital, 84% (65 requests) were made to D2uumrrocqycem.cloudfront.net and 1% (1 request) were made to Widget.reviews.co.uk. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) relates to the external source D2uumrrocqycem.cloudfront.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 866.5 kB (7%)

Content Size

11.7 MB

After Optimization

10.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Microform.digital main page is 11.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 11.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 313.4 kB

  • Original 369.7 kB
  • After minification 285.8 kB
  • After compression 56.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 83.9 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 313.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 552.9 kB

  • Original 11.2 MB
  • After minification 10.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Microform images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 109 B

  • Original 1.9 kB
  • After minification 1.9 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 98.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (41%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

42

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Microform. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

microform.digital accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

microform.digital best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

microform.digital SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Microform.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Microform.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Microform. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: