Access nesaap.lv. Nesap.lv – Viss par sāpēm – sāpju veidi un ārstēšanas līdzekļi

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.3 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.3 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.541

14/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

16/100

10%

nesaap.lv

526 ms

style.css

122 ms

styles.css

248 ms

polls-css.css

247 ms

featured-post.css

247 ms

Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Nesaap.lv, 14% (14 requests) were made to Ifrype.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Nesaap.lv.

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

547.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Nesaap.lv main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 739.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 70.6 kB

Original 83.8 kB
After minification 70.1 kB
After compression 13.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.7 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 37.5 kB

Original 205.7 kB
After minification 168.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Nesaap needs image optimization as it can save up to 37.5 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 485.0 kB

Original 739.7 kB
After minification 706.7 kB
After compression 254.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 485.0 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 551.9 kB

Original 662.9 kB
After minification 613.3 kB
After compression 111.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nesaap.lv needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 551.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nesaap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.